Epstein Secrets

Cir. 2014) 17 Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223077 (D.D.C. Dec. 31, 2019) 20 Dep't of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (1976) 5. 14 Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass 'it, 532 U.S. 1 (2001) 18 Dep't ofJustice v. Report

d 81 (2d Cir. 1991) 19 Human Rights Watch v. Dep't ofJustice & Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 9 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93 (D.D.C. 2019) 20 Knight First Amendment Inst. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (

Cir. 2014) 17 Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223077 (D.D.C. Dec. 31, 2019) 20 Dep't of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (1976) 5. 14 Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass 'it, 532 U.S. 1 (2001) 18 Dep't ofJustice v. Report

d 81 (2d Cir. 1991) 19 Human Rights Watch v. Dep't ofJustice & Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 9 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93 (D.D.C. 2019) 20 Knight First Amendment Inst. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (

gency in that case. 14 See page 2 of the Denial. 15 Shaiyland Water Supply Corp. v. Block, 755 F.2d. 397, 398 (5th Cir. 1985)(citing Department of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361, 96 S.Ct 1592, 1599, 48 L.Ed.2d 11, 21(1976); Charles River Park "A", Inc. v. Department of Housing and Urban Developmen

. Cir. 2007). 1° See, e.g., Morley v. CIA, 508 F.3d 1108, 1126 I n . Cir. 2007) (remanding for agency to "substantiate its Glomar response"); Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Secret Serv., 579 F. Supp. 2d 182, 185-86 (=. 2008) (invalidating agency's Glomar response on basis that agency's proffered harms justifyi