Epstein Secrets

Cir. 2014) 17 Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223077 (D.D.C. Dec. 31, 2019) 20 Dep't of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (1976) 5. 14 Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass 'it, 532 U.S. 1 (2001) 18 Dep't ofJustice v. Report

. 352, 372 (1976)). The "requirement that disclosure be `clearly unwarranted' instructs [courts] to tilt the balance . . . in favor of disclosure." Morley v. C.I.A., 508 F.3d 1108, 1127 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (internal marks omitted). "[U]nder Exemption 6, the presumption in favor of disclosure is as strong

Cir. 2014) 17 Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223077 (D.D.C. Dec. 31, 2019) 20 Dep't of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (1976) 5. 14 Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass 'it, 532 U.S. 1 (2001) 18 Dep't ofJustice v. Report

. 352, 372 (1976)). The "requirement that disclosure be `clearly unwarranted' instructs [courts] to tilt the balance . . . in favor of disclosure." Morley v. C.I.A., 508 F.3d 1108, 1127 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (internal marks omitted). "[U]nder Exemption 6, the presumption in favor of disclosure is as strong

gency in that case. 14 See page 2 of the Denial. 15 Shaiyland Water Supply Corp. v. Block, 755 F.2d. 397, 398 (5th Cir. 1985)(citing Department of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361, 96 S.Ct 1592, 1599, 48 L.Ed.2d 11, 21(1976); Charles River Park "A", Inc. v. Department of Housing and Urban Developmen

10, 21aM.1987). Larson v. Dept. of State, 565 F.3d 857, 862 Cir. 2009) (citing Wolf v. CIA, 473 F.3d 370, 374-75 M . Cir. 2007). 1° See, e.g., Morley v. CIA, 508 F.3d 1108, 1126 I n . Cir. 2007) (remanding for agency to "substantiate its Glomar response"); Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Secret Se