Epstein Secrets

luding two in the U.S. Virgin Islands (including his own private island), and one each in Palm Beach, Florida; Paris, France; New York, New York; and Stanley, New Mexico. The most recent estimated value ofthe defendant’s New York City mansion alone is more than $77 million. The most recent tax-assessed val

dinarily wealthy, and he owns and maintains luxury properties and residences around the world, including in Manhattan, New York; Palm Beach, Florida; Stanley, New Mexico; and Paris, France. Additionally, Epstein owns a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands which, as noted above, is believed to be his p

t, if any of the victims identified in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons

oned in correspondence, including those on the "list." As noted in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438,454, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1038, at fn. 10 (1972): In Stanley, 394 U.S., at 564, 89 S.Ct., at 1247, the Court stated:'(A)lso fundamental is the right to be free, except in very limited circumstances, from unwa

e 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 477 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/26/2010 Page 1 of 24 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON _______________ / Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-809

erved on the following entities: Nine East 71st Street Corp. 301 E. 66th Street Suite 10F New York, NY Zorro Ranch, LLC 49 Zorro Ranch Rd. Stanley, NM JEGE, Inc. through its registered agent Corporation Trust Co. Corporation Trust Center 1209 Orange Street Wilmington, DE The C.O.U.Q.

tein Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 562 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2010 Page 3 of 4 4 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Bradley Jame

specified requests. As noted by the United States Supreme Court in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438,454, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1038, at fn. 10 (1972): In Stanley, 394 U.S., at 564, 89 S.Ct., at 1247, the Court stated:'(A)lso fundamental is the right to be free, except in very limited circumstances, from unwa

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 63 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I --------------

nds and private equity valued at $194,986,301; properties located at 9 East 71st Street, NY, NY 10021 valued at $55,931,000, 49 Zorro Ranch Road, Stanley, New Mexico 87056 valued at $17,246,208, 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida 33480 valued at $12,380,209, 22 Avenue Foch, Paris France 75116 v

d from an at- tempt to stall discovery. See id. at 184-85. UNITED STATES of America, Government, v. Jeffrey EPSTEIN, Defendant 19 CR. 490 (RMB) United States District Court, S.D. New York. Signed July 18, 2019 Background: Defendant was charged with sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy. Defendant moved for

nds and private equity valued at $194,986,301; properties located at 9 East 71st Street, NY, NY 10021 valued at $55,931,000, 49 Zorro Ranch Road, Stanley, New Mexico 87056 valued at $17,246,208, 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida 33480 valued at $12,380,209, 22 Avenue Foch, Paris France 75116 v

d from an at- tempt to stall discovery. See id. at 184-85. UNITED STATES of America, Government, v. Jeffrey EPSTEIN, Defendant 19 CR. 490 (RMB) United States District Court, S.D. New York. Signed July 18, 2019 Background: Defendant was charged with sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy. Defendant moved for

d say adiostlft Its OBVIOUS, payments. kickbacks. DONATIONS, financial promises are all part of this deal. Where is the JUSTICE SYSTEM? Where is the Stale Attorney. The JUDGES? People go to jail for petty thefts, illegal drugs, assault. battery, domestic violence, but this case is PROOF that the LEGAL

al or in pleadings, the Intervenors need not even demonstrate "good cause" in order to obtain relief. As the Hon. Karon Owen Bowdre, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama recently held: '(...continued) LEXIS 66742, at "9-11 (finding settlement communications non-discoverable as "