Epstein Secrets

the best) but the fact that it achieves GOOD (even if not the best) classification accuracy via an architecture with so much biological realism. Itamar's architecture, like that of Jeff Hawkins (but unlike Poggio's), does not aspire to detailed biological realism. This allows it to use recurrent co

one's cognition system. And Poggio's vision system is NOT suitable to be hooked up to a cognition system due to the lack of recurrent connections. Jeff Hawkins' vision system is not suitable either because Hawkins has made some very poor architectural choices. Itamar's system *is* suitable to hook up to a c

the best) but the fact that it achieves GOOD (even if not the best) classification accuracy via an architecture with so much biological realism. Itamar's architecture, like that of Jeff Hawkins (but unlike Poggio's), does not aspire to detailed biological realism. This allows it to use recurrent co

one's cognition system. And Poggio's vision system is NOT suitable to be hooked up to a cognition system due to the lack of recurrent connections. Jeff Hawkins' vision system is not suitable either because Hawkins has made some very poor architectural choices. Itamar's system *is' suitable to hook up to a c

es ;-) I.e., he is extremely sure he has the One True Path ... far more so than all the rest of us egomaniacs.... I doubt that Poggio knows about Itamar's work, but I suspect he would like it. Regarding perception processing, Itamar has the same basic philosophy as Poggio ... the difference is that

cognition system. And Poggio's vision >> system is NOT suitable to be hooked up to a cognition system due to >> the lack of recurrent connections. Jeff Hawkins' vision system is not >> suitable either because Hawkins has made some very poor architectural EFTA_R1_01511232 EFTA02438168 >> choices. Itamar'

ot the best) but the fact that it achieves GOOD (even if not the best) classification accuracy via an architecture with so much biological realism. Itamar's architecture, like that of Jeff Hawkins (but unlike Poggio's), does not aspire to detailed biological realism. This allows it to use recurrent co

one's cognition system. And Poggio's vision system is NOT suitable to be hooked up to a cognition system due to the lack of recurrent connections. Jeff Hawkins' vision system is not suitable either because Hawkins has made some very poor architectural choices. Itamar's system *is* suitable to hook up to a