Epstein Secrets

ht now. 8 NR. UREMIA: So let's get into the Wolfe 9 case. That's where we're headed next. And really 10 there's a trilogy of cases. There's the Levin 11 case, the Echevarria case, if I'm somewhere close 12 to pronouncing that correctly, and the Wolfe case. 13 All of them deal with litigation

ts (3) 25:21 37:21 58:10 settled (2) 44:20,20 settlement (4) 15:23 36:1 42:11 45:8 settlements (4) 32:24 35:14,18 37:3 settles (1) 35:11 SHIPLEY (1) 2:18 shoes (2) 52:10,11 short (1) 56:15 showed (1) 34:7 shows (3) 31:25 43:21 44:16 side (11) 3:19 10:6,7 13:22 15:21,25 37:5 52:6

is a 9 litigation privilege argument that your Honor 10 has heard repeatedly from opposing counsel. It 11 is based upon the Court's decision in Levin, 12 Middlebrooks which describes a broad litigation 13 privilege, applicable in the context of 14 legitimate claims. 15 The attempt to apply

2:14 see 4:1 self-incrimina... 11.10 sense 18:18 sent 3:7 serial 7:4 served 9:4 set 3:22 5:7 16:7 settled 9:5 settlements 9:7 sexual 13:8 SHIPLEY 2:14 short 13:1 shortly 19:3 show 15:2 shows 13:13 sir 4:20 9:16 17:22 19:9 sit 6:6 sitting 6:2 six 13:1 ski 3:23 solely 4:25 6:16 sorry

until right now. MR. BREWER: So let's get into the Wolfe case. That's where we're headed next. And really there's a trilogy of cases. There's the Levin case, the Echevarria case, if I'm somewhere close to pronouncing that correctly, and the Wolfe case. All of them deal with litigation privilege wh

581 75 31:12 41:20,21 resulted (1) 26:1 review (3) 10:13 26:17 44:9 46:6 56:21 Sasser's (5) second (3) 25:11 29:9 31:20 securities (1) SHIPLEY (1) 2:18 shoes (2) 52:10,11 31:13 34:3 59:4 sorry (2) 8:20 29:8 sort (1) 35:13 57:15 26:9,11 29:14 33:10 short (1) 33:20 59:17 43:11 47