3
Shared Docs
2
Same-Page
4 / 3
Mentions
uch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 682-691. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.682 Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, I). S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all cmpiri- 3534-013 Page 15 of 16 EFIA_000 1
ount vital ethical limitations. In addition to the caveats mentioned, boundary con- ditions on the generality of the findings should be considered (Simons, Shoda, & Lindsay, 2017). The sam- ple here consisted largely of African Americans growing up in poverty, surrounded by community violence, in a la
or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Justice, or other funding agencies. Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared that there were no conflicts of interest with respect to
ld pornography located at 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8)." (emphasis supplied)); United States v. Cabot, 325 F.3d 384, 385-86 (2d Cir. 2003); United States v. Simmons, 343 F.3d 72, 81-82 (2d Cir. 2003). These courts have drawn a distinction between the legally established definition of "obscenity," as recognized
s us to dive even deeper into the legislative history. It argues that a Senate Staff Analysis addressing the amendment, and the results of study by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) cited there, demonstrate that the Legislature did not intend to narrow the broad ban on pornographic and obscene materials. See Fla. S. Comm.
ociates, Rockville, Maryland and Washington, D. C., respectively, 1986 -1990 (Aspen Systems Corporation and Koba Associates provide peer review for the National Institute of Justice and Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention). I have served as a consultant to numerous mental health and legal professionals on chil
Page: EFTA00018313 →56. (This article was cited in several amicus briefs submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court or lower courts, e.g., in the APA amicus brief in Roper v. Simmons on the juvenile death penalty). Ghetti, S., Schaaf, J., Qin, J. J., & Goodman, G. S. (2004). Eyewitness testimony. In W. O'Donohue, D. Laws, & C. H
Page: EFTA00018324 →Entities connected to both Russell Simmons and the National Institute of Justice

Julie K. Brown
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSON
Bradley Cooper
PERSON
Lawrence Krauss
PERSON
James Baker
PERSON
Rudy Giuliani
PERSON
Washington D.C.
LOCATION
Puerto Rico
LOCATIONLoftus
PERSON
Goldman Sachs
ORGANIZATION
Wiley
ORGANIZATION
University of Oxford
ORGANIZATION
the National Science Foundation
ORGANIZATIONNicholas
PERSONNorm Eisen
PERSON
Guilford
LOCATIONMalloy
PERSON