Epstein Secrets

nrichment claim is not available where it simply duplicates, or replaces, a conventional contract or tort claim." Id. (citations omitted); see also Simmons v. Ambit Energy Holdings, LLC, No. 503285/2015, 2016 Misc. LEXIS 3954 (Sup. Ct. Oct. 19, 2016). Here, Plaintiffs assert five other causes of action

(internal quotation marks omitted); see also Feliciano v. U.S. Bank N.A., No. 13-CV-5555, 2014 WL 2945798, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. June 27, 2014) (same). The Second Circuit has explained that the type of situation -9- EFTA00802463 warranting equitable tolling is one "where a plaintiff could show that it would have be

Ivan Fisher represented by G. Robert Gage, Jr. (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY Date Filed # Docket Text 11/04/1996 1 COMPLAINT filed; Summons issued and Notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c); FILING FEE $ WAIVED (USA). (ricm) (Entered: 11/06/1996) 11/04/1996 Magistrate Judge Ellis is so De

e law governs in landlord- tenant disputes involving the Government. See Powers United States Postal Sett, 671 F.2d 1041,1043-46 (7th Cir.1982).. The Second Circuit in Kerin did not reach the issue of whether federal common law or state law applied because, in that case, feder- al law and state law led to the s

ence methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)). Additionally, the procedure for disclosing expert witnesses is governed by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedu

ons, the Defense should be permitted to admit Dr. Hall's conclusion as to Alleged Victim 4's substance abuse Def. Br. at 12-13 (collecting cases). The Second Circuit instructs: It is, of course, within the proper scope of cross-examination to determine whether a witness was under the influence of drugs or narcot