Epstein Secrets

Ivan Fisher represented by G. Robert Gage, Jr. (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY Date Filed # Docket Text 11/04/1996 1 COMPLAINT filed; Summons issued and Notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c); FILING FEE $ WAIVED (USA). (ricm) (Entered: 11/06/1996) 11/04/1996 Magistrate Judge Ellis is so De

pick up at a Pennsylvania business, and then return to Ohio, the Defendants purposely availed themselves to the benefits of doing business in the Commonwealth. While merely passing through a state is not a sufficient contact to warrant jurisdiction, when a party makes a business delivery in the state Pa

e 1895 predecessor to the current Garb Statute was upheld against a similar state constitutional challenge by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth I. Herr, 229 Pa. 132. 78 A. 68 (1910). and this Court is not at liberty to reconsider that vin- tage ruling. 561 ing enforcement of ARIN's Religi

t memory under hyp- nosis is mixed (see Sanders & Simmons. 1983; Smith, 1983, for reviews). Of greater pra

all, yet has none of the negative consequences of hypnosis, it has been suggested as a preferable alternative (Delfenbacher 1988; Orne, as cited in Commonwealth v. Di Nicole', 1985), and one that should be more acceptable by the courts (Yoffie & Kim, 1987). In addition to its technical merit, the Cognitive

must use standard methods for interpreting a stat- ute. "When interpreting a statute, la court's] inquiry begins with the text." United States v. Simmons, 247 F.3d 118, 122 (4th Cir.2001); United States v. Ron Pair Enters, Inc., 489 U.S. 235, 241, 109 S.Ct. 1026, 1030, 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989). The C

e he was arrested in Defendant pos- sessed the illicit videotape, which caused a continuing tortious injury to her. Defen- dant's residence in the Commonwealth at the time some of the illegal conduct oc- curred is sufficient for the Court to exer- cise jurisdiction over the Defendant. Moreover, he was a re