Epstein Secrets

n in Limine 3).................+ 8 4. Louis Freeh’s testimony and report are admissible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's claims are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted (Motion in Limine 5)... i.e seeeesseeseereeeeeeneeeneeees 11 6. E

served this Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion In Limine via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Paul G. Cassell Meredith Schultz 383 S. University Street BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP Salt Lake City, UT 84112 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 P| Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

imine 3).................. 8 io) 4. Louis Freeh’s testimony and report are admissible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's claims are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted (Motion in Limine 5)....0....0.00ccccccceccecceeeseceeeseeeees 11

electronically served this Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion In Limine via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Meredith Schultz BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] [email protected] Bradley J. E

A. Menninger in Support of Defendant's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Limine via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Meredith Schultz BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] [email protected] Bradley J.

howed that her lawyers had sent a letter to Buckingham Palace asking to interview the prince under oath. In her sworn affidavit, the woman described Buckingham Palace's denial that sexual contact ever took place between the pair as "false and hurtful to me." Interview request The woman, identified by Buckingham Pal