Epstein Secrets

rtin Hamilton-Smith and Marshall declared a leadership spill against Redmond and Williams.18)194 In a partyroom ballot occurred on 23 October 2012, Redmond retained the leadership by one vote; however, Marshall was elected to the deputy leadershipisincilinIMarshall was denied his preferred treasury port

EFTA00262299 LI ZUIZZ. itaa MNt V Pau., vi imps. •••• • • • week before the 2010 election for not being Willing to publicly refuse challenging Redmond for the leadership and faced accusations, particularly by Hamilton-Smith, of derailing the Liberal campaign, with "Chapman Could Challenge" posters

tfolios, while retaining his roles in industry and trade, defence, small business and science.041 Leader of the Opposition On 31 January 2013 after Redmond resigned as Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the SA Lib it was speculated that Marshall would succeed her*t the ballot on 4 Februa arshal wa

Porte- Damian (SAPOL)- Rice AdarrtISAEOLI; RWell DIPPY- Ryan. Stephen (SAPOI ); SAPDI :Staff Offirer5; 2SiO.o8O,1On(SAPC11.); Wood. Crain (SAPOL1; 'North. Peter (SAPOLI; SEC:Ambulance. SEC:8OM; SE;C5; SEC:CDSjoitoo SEC:Defence. SECDEM. SEC:DPC-IC• saxm; iRr-Erainperino- SEC-GRN; s€C:Healffi; 5Rctinf0

w total up the benefit to the rest of us? The convenience, the efficiency, the benefits of Microsoft's billions of research spending might dwarf even Redmond’s massive profits. “Increasing returns,” Arthur wrote, “cause businesses to work differently and they stand many of our notions of how business opera

ther dangers: Leslie Lamport, “Computer Science and State Machines”, Contribution to a Festschrift honoring Willem-Paul de Roever on his retirement” (Redmond: Microsoft Research, 2008). In its entirety it runs: “Computer scientists collectively suffer from what I call the Whorfian syndrome—the confusion of

le possibility: What if, some day, a computer could think better than a human. Could, in a nanosecond, come back with that elusive rhyme for “Forth”: North. For such a machine, passing Turing’s Test — thinking like a human - was an interesting challenge. But more interesting 257 “Can machines think”: A.

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 8 of 11 interests to outweigh the need for probative evidence."Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 9-19,116 S. Ct.1923, 135 L.Ed. 2d 337 (1996); Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 47,100 S. Ct. 906, 63 L.Ed.2d 186 (1980). Recogn

matters. Thus, when once- secret grand jury material becomes "sufficiently widely known," it may "los[e] its character as Rule 6(e) material." In re North, 16 F.3d 1234 (D. C. Cir. 1994). 3 EFTA00600067 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 187 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 4 of 4 It is accordin