Epstein Secrets

d actual 2 prior knowledge of the issues, of the at-issue statements that 3 were offered by the defendant. Again, the statements were made 4 to Crescenz. 5 And then the last case is a 1983 case, Tierney v. 6 Davidson. That involved civil rights violations and objective 7 reasonableness by the of

? 17 MR. CASSELL: Right. So you can't just say, hey, is 18 the moon made of green cheese and they take the Fifth. You 19 can't put that in, and Booty recognizes that. There has to be 20 independent evidence that supports each question that's asked. 21 And so what we've done in our brief, if you

d actual 2 prior knowledge of the issues, of the at-issue statements that 3 were offered by the defendant. Again, the statements were made 4 to Crescenz. 5 And then the last case is a 1983 case, Tierney v. 6 Davidson. That involved civil rights violations and objective 7 reasonableness by the of

he questions? MR. CASSELL: Right. So you can't just say, hey, is the moon made of green cheese and they take the Fifth. You can't put that in, and Booty recognizes that. There has to be independent evidence that supports each question that's asked. And so what we've done in our brief, if you look at

efendant had actual prior knowledge of the issues, of the at-issue statements that were offered by the defendant. Again, the statements were mad to Crescenz. And then the last case is a 1983 case, Tierney v. Davidson. That involved civil rights violations and objective reasonableness by the officers who

he questions? MR. CASSELL: Right. So you can't just say, hey, is the moon made of green cheese and they take the Fifth. You can't put that in, and Booty recognizes that. There has to be independent evidence that supports each question that's asked. And so what we've done in our brief, if you look at