Epstein Secrets

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

alm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeini 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 17. On July 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 19. On July 10, 2004, Defendant cause

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa, 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

orida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 17. On July 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and 48 EFTA02857567 traveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 19. On July 10, 2004, Defendant be m

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

o Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boein ' i 727 aircraft ownec endant JEGE, INC. 17. On July 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 19. On July 10, 2004, Defendant cause