Epstein Secrets

tary in the Johnson administration from 1965 to 1967), whose in this week's television show, Moyers & Company on PBS, he interviewed Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who's been an independent in Congress for 21 years — longer than anyone in American history. in the EFTA00667362 interview Sanders talks about jo

enator Bernie Sanders, who's been an independent in Congress for 21 years — longer than anyone in American history. in the EFTA00667362 interview Sanders talks about jobs, the state of our economy, health care, and the unprecedented impact of big money on the major political parties. As Sanders put i

& Company on PBS, he interviewed Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who's been an independent in Congress f

similar to what you might expect from a college professor and philosophy student and not a fringe Bratt Pack actor In the interview, Cusack quizzes Turley on President Obama, both positive and negative and in stark contrast to how Republicans like to brand him and how most of his supporters see him. Tu

or may be in the case." Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978). Discovery is not limi

.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985)(citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77 (1973)). The privilege is acco

nt discovery stage. See Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978). Accordingly, Epstein

Docket 02/04/2010 Page 2 of 14 3 Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77 (1973)). The privilege is acco

t discovery stage. See Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340. 352 (1978). Accordingly, Epstein

668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985)(citing 2 EFTA00592192 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 462 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2010 Page 3 of 14 Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77 (1973)). The privilege is accorded liberal construction in favor of the right it was intended to secure," Hoffman v. United States

hat bears on, or that reasonably could lead to another matter that could bear on any issue that is or may be in the case." Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978). Discovery is not limited to the issues raised by the pleadings because 'discovery itself is designed to help define and

nformal, where the answers might incriminate him in future proceedings." See Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985) (citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77 (1973)). The privilege is accorded liberal construction in favor of the right and extends not only to answers that would support a

that bears on, or that reasonably could lead to another matter that could bear on any issue that is or may be in the case? Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978). Discovery is not limited to the issues raised by the pleadings because "discovery itself is designed to help define and

al, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings." Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985)(citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70. 77 (1973)). The privilege is accorded "liberal construction in favor of the right it was intended to secure," Hoffman v. United State