Epstein Secrets

om? 2 A It was a little bit bigger. Obviously it was 3 configured differently. Thin isn't a rectangular 4 office. I worked for Marty Fine and Bernie 4 Jacobson in Miami. They didn't have an open door / policy. • So their office was set up in the ➢ane way 9 as Rothstein? 10 Il 12 13 la

d by the firm to work with 4 Stove Abrams in opening up the office here. 5 Q Did you then interview with the firm of 4 Rothstein, Rosenfoldt a Adler? 7 A Yea. Stuart and I talked, and then ho 4 introduced ma to Scott Rothstein, and that was the • interview I had. 10 Rothstein and I talked

here in 2008 you faced the economic reality of having to leave the bench. where did you than go? A I was hired by the Rothstein, Rosonfoldt a Adler firm. O How did that cone about? A As I said, I was interviewing with two firms. 10 There wore two largo firma that had offices in Palm Beach

UNION NATIONAL BANK RAYFIELD JR,H E SANDERS,LEWIS A TIEFEL,WILLIAM SMITH,HAROLD

INIUM ASSOCIATION INC MILLNER,GUY W ADLER,FREDERICK LAUDER,JOSEPH JOHNSON,CHA

la. 1966). It is not enough for the opposing party merely to assert that an issue of fact does exist. Fisel v. Wynns, 667 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.1996); Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368, 370 (F1a.1979) (same). Moreover, it is well-recognized that the non-moving party faced with a summary judgment motion su

by Scott Rothstein. For example, Epstein alleges generally that "Edwards's... actions constitute a fraud upon Epstein as [Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler], [Scott] Rothstein and the Litigation Team represented themselves to be acting in good faith and with the best interests of their clients in mind

22fkw I yrnitar.nr 00709 5920 (pt Ecclestone, Bernie 28 Chelsea 44 207 684 e6 88 (w) 44 207589 03 Ga

il HaroldMtamollin.com Hashemi, Janie $ Morarrit Leaden X70X 447711 252 VI 442072 51254 0207-235 1254 Hedberg, Gregory & Margaret Mach-el 4 Adler An Garry 336 East 69th (h) New York. NY 1 1 NY New (Hrr02 York NY M484 The Vineyard Indiana Home Private Line Home t 8 (0) Hunter, Jo

So.2d 404 (Fla.1991) (Father prosecuted for crime of video recording of minor daughter in violation of statute concerning depiction of sex acts); Sanders State, 568 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (Father prosec- uted for lewd and lascivious acts against minor daughter). FN6. See, e.g., Zordan I Pag

8,9 clear 11:7 client 3:21 10:17 close A acc 7:24 access 6:18 7:24 11:2 12:8 12:15 13:22 addendum 4:14 addresses 8:19 adduced 3:4. Adler 2:12 Administr... 5:22 8:18 9:18 11:22 13:10 14:5 12:18 Anybody 3:23 14:14 anyway 10:2 apparently 2:3 Avenue 2:19 An 1:4,4 a.m 13:3