Epstein Secrets

nredacted> (9/30, Leopold, Bensinger) reports a federal judge has ruled "that the Justice Department improperly redacted significant portions of the Mueller report and must release those sections by Nov. 2, just one day before the presidential election." In a 40-page opinion "released Wednesday, US Distr

om-mueller> (9/30, Neidig, 2.98M) reports the specific redactions "he took issue with cover the decisionmaking process within former special counsel Robert Mueller's team over whether to charge certain people with crimes during the probe." Walton wrote "the Court concludes that the Department has failed to satis

the decisionmaking process within former special counsel Robert Mueller's team over whether to charge certain people with crimes during the probe." Walton wrote "the Court concludes that the Department has failed to satisfy its burden to demonstrate that the withheld material is protected by the delibe

zFeed News (9/30, Leopold, Bensinger) reports a federal judge has ruled "that the Justice Department improperly redacted significant portions of the Mueller report and must release those sections by Nov. 2, just one day before the presidential election." In a 40-page opinion "released Wednesday, US Dist

" The Hill (9/30, Neidig, 2.98M) reports the specific redactions "he took issue with cover the decisionmaking process within former special counsel Robert Mueller's team over whether to charge certain people with crimes during the probe." Walton wrote "the Court concludes that the Department has failed to satis

the decisionmaking process within former special counsel Robert Mueller's team over whether to charge certain people with crimes during the probe." Walton wrote "the Court concludes that the Department has failed to satisfy its burden to demonstrate that the withheld material is protected by the delib

zFeed News (9/30, Leopold, Bensinger) reports a federal judge has ruled "that the Justice Department improperly redacted significant portions of the Mueller report and must release those sections by Nov. 2, just one day before the presidential election." In a 40-page opinion "released Wednesday, US Dist

The Hill (9/30, Neidig, 2.98M) reports the specific redactions "he took issue with cover the decisionmaking process within former special counsel Robert Mueller's team over whether to charge certain people with crimes during the probe." Walton wrote "the Court concludes that the Department has failed to satis

the decisionmaking process within former special counsel Robert Mueller's team over whether to charge certain people with crimes during the probe." Walton wrote "the Court concludes that the Department has failed to satisfy its burden to demonstrate that the withheld material is protected by the delib

Investigation. • Former Trump Attorney: Durham Should "Taker A Hard Look" At Weissmann. • Judge Extends Deadline For DO) To Answer Questions About Mueller Report. • Former FBI Official Criticizes Mueller Investigation. • DDoSecrets Releases Wikileaks "Chats, Strategy Sessions" Related To Assange Case.

d" would not be considered. EFTA00150065 COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE Further Legal Action Against Stone Urged. Andrew Weissmann, a senior prosecutor in Robert Mueller's special counsel investigation, writes in an op-ed in the New York Times (7/14, 18.61M) that despite "the latest act by this administration to under

tment's request for a delay to answer questions about former special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 election." Walton "gave the Trump administration until next Tuesday to respond, a week later than what was previously scheduled." The Electronic Privacy Information

y sensitive cases. Berman's rare remarks follow actions taken by Attorney General William Barr, from his characterization of former special counsel Robert Mueller's investigative conclusions to the sentencing of Trump ally Roger Stone, that have raised concerns among current and former prosecutors that Barr is d

in public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report." (Judge Walton is hardly alone in this assessment; Mueller himself castigated Barr for "not fully captur[ing] the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions.") The judge notes Barr'

serious doubt whether Attorney General William Barr possesses either of these golden prosecutorial virtues (and before anyone cries politics, Judge Walton was nominated to the bench by President George W. Bush, a Republican, in 2001). Judge Walton's opinion pulls no punches. He finds that "the Court ca

zFeed News (9/30, Leopold, Bensinger) reports a federal judge has ruled "that the Justice Department improperly redacted significant portions of the Mueller report and must release those sections by Nov. 2, just one day before the presidential election." In a 40-page opinion "released Wednesday, US Dist

" The Hill (9/30, Neidig, 2.98M) reports the specific redactions "he took issue with cover the decisionmaking process within former special counsel Robert Mueller's team over whether to charge certain people with crimes during the probe." Walton wrote "the Court concludes that the Department has failed to satis

the decisionmaking process within former special counsel Robert Mueller's team over whether to charge certain people with crimes during the probe." Walton wrote "the Court concludes that the Department has failed to satisfy its burden to demonstrate that the withheld material is protected by the delib