Epstein Secrets

s 13 just no reason we should be allowed to ask about all these 14 other bad acts. 15 Sack cites, your Honor, to an Eleventh Circuit case, 16 Schafer vs. Time, Inc. In that case, your Honor, Sack says the 17 Eleventh Circuit found the district court had been correct when 18 it ruled that the de

D FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 20 BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. 21 22 23 24 25 SO

P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 20 BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. 21 22 23 24

s 13 just no reason we should be allowed to ask about all these 14 other bad acts. 15 Sack cites, your Honor, to an Eleventh Circuit case, 16 Schafer vs. Time, Inc. In that case, your Honor, Sack says the 17 Eleventh Circuit found the district court had been correct when 18 it ruled that the de

N AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPO

AN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRIC

now, that there is just no reason we should be allowed to ask about all these other bad acts. Sack cites, your Honor, to an Eleventh CircuLt case, Schafer vs. Time, Inc. In that case, your Honor, Sack says the Eleventh Circuit found the district court had been correct when it ruled that the defendant,

GAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT R (2

EMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT

MAXWELL, Defendant. poe nen nee nee eee eee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011463 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF C

eer reso sessment rere memeneistseee 13, 28 S.E.C. v. Collins & Aikman Corp., 256 F.R.D. 403, 412 (S.D.N-Y. 2009) oo. ceeeeeecesteeteeteeeeeeeees 19 Schafer v. Time, Inc., 142 F.3d 1361, 1364-75 (1 1th Cir. 1998) oo. eee ceseesseesseeeseeeseeeseeeneessaee 3 Seligson, Morris & Neuburger v Fairbanks Whitne

33-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. wen ee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014788 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:15-

V-00708-DN, 2015 WL 3533844, at *5 (D. Utah i eb) 13,28 S.E.C. v. Collins & Aikman Corp., 256 F.R.D. 403, 412 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) oo. cccccteeeseeeee 19 Schafer v. Time, Inc., 142 F.3d 1361, 1364-75 (11th Cir. 1998) oo ccceeeeeseteeteesetseteeteesenes 3 Seligson, Morris & Neuburger v Fairbanks Whitney Corp.,