5
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
5 / 8
Mentions
handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning
D FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 20 BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. 21 22 23 24 25 SO
P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 20 BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. 21 22 23 24
handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning
N AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPO
AN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRIC
tness in the case. As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, she's planning to call Mr. Dershowitz. Mr. Dershowitz is going to say Ms. Boylan told him that Ms. Giuffre told him something, and so we have the classic hearsay within a hearsay situation. The problem, of course, is that Boylan
GAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT R (2
EMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT
MAXWELL, Defendant. poe nen nee nee eee eee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011463 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF C
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011463 →g is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19)... eee 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion 1n Limine 20)... ceececesessseeseeceeeeseeneeceseeseeneeeeeerseeeaees 31 C. Plaintiff's Remaining Motions In Limine Are Prematu
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011465 →Microsoft Word - 2017.03.16 Deft Resp IO to Ptfs Omnibus Motn in Limine (MASTER).docx
33-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. wen ee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014788 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:15-
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014788 →nt and admissible (Motion in Limine 19).................00. 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion in Limine 20)... ccccccccccceceeceeeceseeesecneesseesteeesaeenes 31 C. Plaintiff's Remaining Motions In Limine Are Premature an
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014790 →Entities connected to both Boylan and Jeffrey Pagliuca

Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONLaura Menninger
PERSON
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Denver
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATION
David Boies
PERSONSigrid McCawley
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Nicole Simmons
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION