Epstein Secrets

against 10 him, and what's at issue in this case is, again, Maxwell's 11 statements against my client. 12 The case that they cite actually, the Minemyer case, 13 goes against them. It actually talks about how you would have 14 to call the reporter, that that couldn't come into evidence. 15 And s

D FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 20 BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. 21 22 23 24 25 SO

P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 20 BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. 21 22 23 24

y my client against him, and what's at issue in this case is, again, Maxwell's statements against my client. The case that they cite actually, the Minemyer case, goes against them. It actually talks about how you would have to call the reporter, that that couldn't come into evidence. And so, your Hono

N AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPO

AN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRIC

by my client against him, and what's at issue in this case is, again, Maxwell's statements against my client. The case that they cite actually, the Minemyer case, goes against them. It actually talks about how you would have to call the reporter, that that couldn't come into evidence. And so, your Hono

GAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT R (2

EMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT

MAXWELL, Defendant. poe nen nee nee eee eee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011463 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF C

7 Mich. App. 1, 12, 602 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1999)... eee 13 Longmire v. Ala. State Univ., 151 F.R.D. 414, 419 (M.D.Ala. 1992)... cece ee eee ee ee eee 3 Minemyer v. R-Boc Representatives, Inc., No. 07 C 1763, 2012 WL 379904, at *4 (N.D. IIL Feb. 6, 2012) oo eeeeseseessesscssenecrscsecseesecsesessesesseseesses

33-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. wen ee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014788 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:15-

ss'n, 237 Mich. App. 1, 12, 602 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1999)... 13 Longmire v. Ala. State Univ., 151 F.R.D. 414, 419 (M.D.Ala. 1992). 000.00. cece cee ed Minemyer v. R-Boc Representatives, Inc., No. 07 C 1763, 2012 WL 379904, at *4 (N.D. ILL. Feb. 6, 2012) oe ceecceececcecccecceseeecesecsecseeceeeseesecseesaec