Epstein Secrets

l has expired. Dated: May ,f, 2010 SO ORDERED. Lawrence M. McKenna U.S.D.J. 3 Persons other than Jane D

about Mr. Rush's interview of Mr. Epstein. (Fisten Aff., Apr. 23, 2010 [Real Party in Interest Jane Doe's Resp. in Opp'n to Mot. of Daily News, to Quash Subpoena, Ex. B] 1 3.) Mr. Rush paraphrased the interview relatively thoroughly. (Id. 1 7.) 4. As noted above, the present motion has been argued on the

appeal has expired. SO ORDERED. 14 ‘—`---- .4, Lawrence M. McKenna O.S.D.J. 3 Persons other than Jane D

Mr. Rush's interview of Mr. Epstein. (Fisten Aff., Apr. 23, 2010 [Real Party in Interest Jane Doe's Resp. in Opp'n to Mot. of Daily News, L.P., to Quash Subpoena, Ex. B] 1 3.) Mr. Rush paraphrased the interview relatively thoroughly. (Id. 1 7.) 4. As noted above, the present motion has been argued on the

d 833 (3d Dep't 1997) Fraser v. Park Newspapers Lawrence Inc., 257..2d 961, 684 .2d 332 (3d Dep't 1999)

sclosing brief portions of the Epstein interview to third parties (Balin Aff. Ex. K (Jane Doe's Response in Opposition to Motion of Daily News, to Quash Subpoena), at 6-13) — the same exact waiver argument he makes here. The federal District Court (McKenna, J.) did not accept Edwards' waiver argument; but, i