Epstein Secrets

.0708. [9] A. De Simone. M. P. Hertzberg. and F. Wilczek. Phys.Lett. B678. 1 (2009). arXiv:0812.4946. [1

S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Phys.Rev. D7. 1888 (1973). [50] D. I. Kaiser. Phys.Rev. D81.084044 (2010), arXiv:1003.1159. 151] L. M. Krauss and E Wilczek. Phys.Rev. D89. 047501 (2014). arXiv:1309.5343. [52] B. M. Kastening. Phys.Lett. 11283, 287 (1992). [53] M. Bando. T Kugo, N. Maekawa. and H. Naka

g for the Higgs field. C = ciblibR. where (ff is the Higgs dou- blet and R the Ricci scalar. One can remove the non-minimal coupling term from the Lagrangian by performing a confor- mal transformation, go,„(x) = 51-2(x)li,„(s) where D2 = 1 + 2e(}141/4/1, (2) is the conformal factor and My is the reduced

Some examples of brandied Hamiltonians were explored both classically and in the context of quan- tum mechanics, as recently advocated by Shapere and Wilczek. These are in fact cases of switch- back potentials, albeit in momentum space, as previously analyzed by us for quasi-Hamiltonian chaotic dynamical

litated obtaining analytic results as well as a numerical study of this special model. The supersymmetric system in question is given by a cube root Lagrangian, and a corresponding double-valued Hamiltonian. L=C(v-1)13—V(x) e=:- Legendre Ht d2 = 1L) + V (x) , V (x) = 22 — (1) 2Vp Q111 in p space

S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Phys.Rev. D7, 1888 (1973). 50] D. I. Kaiser. Phys.Rev. D81, 084044 (2010), arXiv:1003.1159. 51] L. M. Krauss and F Wilczek, Phys.Rev. D89. 047501 (2014), arXiv:1309.5343. 52] B. M. Kastening. Phys.Lett. B283. 287 (1992). 53] M. Bando. T. Kugo, N. Maekawa. and H. Nakano

ng for the Higgs field, G = -4 $t4,R, where 4> is the Higgs dou- blet and R the Ricci scalar. One can remove the non-minimal coupling term from the Lagrangian by performing a confor- mal transformation, 9,,,(x) = r1-2(x)§0,(x) where 122 = 1 + 2e4)t./All, (2) is the conformal factor and Alp is the reduced