Epstein Secrets

fully auctioned to Penguin Press. Tentative title: DEEP THINKING: ON THE PROMISE AND PERIL OF AI. The inspiration for framing the project came from Jaan Tallin, co-founder of Skype and science philanthropist, who, in the abstract for his essay, writes: "An interesting cultural evolution is happening in the

science historians Peter Galison, George Dyson, and David Kaiser; the technologist Jaan Tallin; the cognitive scientist Tom Griffiths, the writers Kevin Kelly and Pamela McCorduck. As Daniel C. Dennett notes: "resurrecting Wiener as a major thinker (something I myself agree with) is a sort of thankless ta

sfully auctioned to Penguin Press. =entative title: DEEP THINKING: ON THE PROMISE AND PERIL OF Al. The =nspiration for framing the project came from Jaan Tallin, co-founder of Skype and =cience philanthropist, who, in the abstract for his essay, =rites: "An interesting cultural evolution is happening =n the

e science =istorians Peter Galison, George Dyson, and David Kaiser; the technologist Jaan Tallin; =he cognitive scientist Tom Griffiths, the writers Kevin Kelly and Pamela =cCorduck. As Daniel C. Dennett notes: "resurrecting =iener as a major thinker (something I myself agree with) is a sort of thankless t

lision between opposing perspectives is salutary and exhilarating; some of these figures, such as computer scientist Stuart Russell, Skype co-founder Jaan Tallinn, and physicist Max Tegmark, are deeply concerned with the threat of AI, including the existential one, while others, notably robotics entrepreneur Ro

ieve, an approach that may work. Humans can reasonably be described as having (mostly implicit) preferences over their future lives—that is, given @ Kevin Kelly, “The Myth of a Superhuman AI,” Wired, Apr. 25, 2017. 33 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016836 enough time and unlimited visual aids, a human could express a pre

lision between opposing perspectives is salutary and exhilarating; some of these figures, such as computer scientist Stuart Russell, Skype co-founder Jaan Tallinn, and physicist Max Tegmark, are deeply concerned with the threat of AI, including the existential one, while others, notably robotics entrepreneur Ro

ieve, an approach that may work. Humans can reasonably be described as having (mostly implicit) preferences over their future lives—that is, given @ Kevin Kelly, “The Myth of a Superhuman AI,” Wired, Apr. 25, 2017. 33 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016253 enough time and unlimited visual aids, a human could express a pre