Epstein Secrets

d into evidence a Wells Fargo "screen shot" purportedly showing that the loan was placed into the Trust on June 28, 2007. Olsak called one witness, Richard Kahn, a mortgage foreclosure fraud investigator and securitization auditor. Over the Trust's objections, Kahn, a non-lawyer whom the trial court treated

8, 2007. Olsak called one witness, Richard Kahn, a mortgage foreclosure fraud investigator and securitization auditor. Over the Trust's objections, Kahn, a non-lawyer whom the trial court treated as an expert witness, gave opinion testimony that the Trust documents did not allow for the Trust to acq

40,000. Orion Bank's loan was memorialized with a promissory note (the "Olsak Note"), and secured with a mortgage (the "Olsak Mortgage") encumbering Olsak's real property in Key West, Florida. After Olsak defaulted [".2] on the note and mortgage by failing to make a required installment payment, the T

d into evidence a Wells Fargo "screen shot" purportedly showing that the loan was placed into the Trust on June 28, 2007. Olsak called one witness, Richard Kahn, a mortgage foreclosure fraud investigator and securitization auditor. Over the Trust's objections, Kahn, a non-lawyer whom the trial court treated

8, 2007. Olsak called one witness, Richard Kahn, a mortgage foreclosure fraud investigator and securitization auditor. Over the Trust's objections, Kahn, a non-lawyer whom the trial court treated as an expert witness, gave opinion testimony that the Trust documents did not allow for the Trust to acq

40,000. Orion Bank's loan was memorialized with a promissory note (the "Olsak Note"), and secured with a mortgage (the "Olsak Mortgage") encumbering Olsak's real property in Key West, Florida. After Olsak defaulted [".2] on the note and mortgage by failing to make a required installment payment, the T

a trial judge to rely upon expert testimony to determine questions of law. Devin v. City of Hollywood, 351 So. 2d 1022, 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Kahn's testimony was devoid of facts to assist the trial court in making its own legal conclusions regarding the Trust's standing. Rather, Kahn simply pr

MICs. Interestingly, when Kahn was asked on cross-examination if an endorsed-in-blank note is a transferrable instrument, the trial court sustained Olsak's [** 6] objection that the question called for a legal conclusion. We are compelled to reverse the trial court's determination that the Trust lacke