Epstein Secrets

d into evidence a Wells Fargo "screen shot" purportedly showing that the loan was placed into the Trust on June 28, 2007. Olsak called one witness, Richard Kahn, a mortgage foreclosure fraud investigator and securitization auditor. Over the Trust's objections, Kahn, a non-lawyer whom the trial court treated

8, 2007. Olsak called one witness, Richard Kahn, a mortgage foreclosure fraud investigator and securitization auditor. Over the Trust's objections, Kahn, a non-lawyer whom the trial court treated as an expert witness, gave opinion testimony that the Trust documents did not allow for the Trust to acq

nvoluntarily dismissing the Trust's foreclosure complaint post-trial. The trial court entered final judgment against the Trust based exclusively on Appellees' expert witness who testified at trial that the Trust was not, and never had been, the holder of the subject note. We reverse because the trial cour

d into evidence a Wells Fargo "screen shot" purportedly showing that the loan was placed into the Trust on June 28, 2007. Olsak called one witness, Richard Kahn, a mortgage foreclosure fraud investigator and securitization auditor. Over the Trust's objections, Kahn, a non-lawyer whom the trial court treated

8, 2007. Olsak called one witness, Richard Kahn, a mortgage foreclosure fraud investigator and securitization auditor. Over the Trust's objections, Kahn, a non-lawyer whom the trial court treated as an expert witness, gave opinion testimony that the Trust documents did not allow for the Trust to acq

nvoluntarily dismissing the Trust's foreclosure complaint post-trial. The trial court entered final judgment against the Trust based exclusively on Appellees' expert witness who testified at trial that the Trust was not, and never had been, the holder of the subject note. We reverse because the trial cour

a trial judge to rely upon expert testimony to determine questions of law. Devin v. City of Hollywood, 351 So. 2d 1022, 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Kahn's testimony was devoid of facts to assist the trial court in making its own legal conclusions regarding the Trust's standing. Rather, Kahn simply pr

merely legal conclusions of a party's expert. IV. Conclusion Because the record on appeal reflects that the trial court impermissibly relied upon Appellees' expert's legal conclusions, we reverse the trial court's final order involuntarily dismissing the Trust's claim, and remand for further proceedings

ki), Martin Wachter, Erwin Wachter, Sercor Treuhand Anstalt, and Asat Trust (Asat). Generally, the district court predicated the dismissals of those Appellees on its conclusions that: (1) a defendant’s indirect funding of al- *19 Qaeda through a charitable intermediary “is, under controlling Second Circuit

ury regarding the designations of Yousef Nada-related entities); R.1762, Ex. 5, p. 10 (October 22, 2003 Testimony of Former National Security Advisor Richard A. Clarke before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee). 2 JA3838-39, 4365, 6208-09, 6236. So JA3724. a1 The pleadings allege that al Rajhi Bank senior of