Epstein Secrets

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

ts that this Court enter an Order Striking Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Objections to Epstein's Discovery Requests' and Compelling Edwards to produce documents and/or Interrogatory responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstan

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

ts that this Court enter an Order Striking Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Objections to Epstein's Discovery Requests' and Compelling Edwards to produce documents and/or Interrogatory responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstan

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

ts that this Court enter an Order Striking Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Objections to Epstein's Discovery Requests' and Compelling Edwards to produce documents and/or Interrogatory responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstan