Epstein Secrets

evelopment of [evidentiary] privileges.' Adkins g Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th 2007), quoting Tramm

counsel and the government led to Epstein's plea of guilty in state court. In the sole case cited by the Court for this proposition, United States'. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 1990), the defendant pled guilty to federal charges pursuant to his plea agreement. That Mr. Epstein entered into a plea i

evelopment of [evidentiary] privileges.' Adkins g Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th 2007), quoting Tramm

counsel and the government led to Epstein's plea of guilty in state court. In the sole case cited by the Court for this proposition, United States'. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 1990), the defendant pled guilty to federal charges pursuant to his plea agreement. That Mr. Epstein entered into a plea i

ional means for ascertaining the truth, Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324 (11" Cir. 2007), citing United St

M Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 5 of 11 proceedings against the defendant making them under Rule 410. See e.g United States v. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229, 1235 (.5th Cir. 1990)(statements made during negotiations that resulted in a final plea of guilty not protected under Rule 410), ce

erative need for confidence and trust, 3) the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and 4) the consensus among the states." Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007). These factors all militate in favor of the recognition that there is a common law privilege for settlement/pl

. 2012) 24, 25 *United States v. Mezzanatto, 513 U.S. 196 (1995) 6, 14, 28, 53 United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 (1975) 20 United States v. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1039 (1991) 26 United States v. Robertson, 582 F.2d 1356 (5th Cir. 1978) 24 vii EFTA0020

ional means for ascertaining the truth, Adidas v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324 (11ih Cir. 2007), citing United S

M Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 5 of 11 proceedings against the defendant making them under Rule 410. See e.g United States v. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229, 1235 (5ih Cir. 1990)(statements made during negotiations that resulted in a final plea of guilty not protected under Rule 410), cer

velopment of [evidentiary] privileges." Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007), quoting T

ounsel and the government led to Epstein's plea of guilty in state court. In the sole case cited by the Court for this proposition, United States v. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 1990), the defendant pled guilty to federal charges pursuant to his plea agreement. That Mr. Epstein entered into a plea i

velopment of [evidentiary] privileges!" Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007), quoting T

ounsel and the government led to Epstein's plea of guilty in state court. In the sole case cited by the Court for this proposition, United States v. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 1990), the defendant pled guilty to federal charges pursuant to his plea agreement. That Mr. Epstein entered into a plea i

lopment of [evidentiary] privileges.'" Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007), quoting T

the government led to Epstein's plea of guilty in state court. In the sole case cited by the district court for this proposition, United States v. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 1990), the defendant pled guilty to federal charges pursuant to his plea agreement. That Mr. Epstein entered into a plea i

elopment of [evidentiary] privileges!" Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007), quoting T

counsel and the government led to Epstein plea of guilty in state court. In the sole case cited by the Court for this proposition, United States v. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 5 EFTA00584595 1990), the defendant pled guilty to federal charges pursuant to his plea agreement. That Mr. Epstein ent