Epstein Secrets

ant to which such payment was made. Include in 2 Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Ma

in this case, Jack Scarola ("Scarola"), for their flagrant violation of the confidentiality agreements between Epstein and Edwards's clients L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, as well as enter an Order of entitlement to costs and attorneys' fees in favor of Epstein and against Edwards and Scarola. In support

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

n related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and is protected by

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

n related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and is protected by