Epstein Secrets

ant to which such payment was made. Include in 2 Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Ma

:35 PM JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, Individually, and L.M., individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIF

issible evidence" are legally impermissible. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Di

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: CROW PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDAN

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEN

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEN

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEN