Epstein Secrets

SCHRAM,RONALD BROBERG,PETER CHRISTU,MAURA SLOPE TRAIL LLC BOYLES,KEVAN

BAUM,JOYCE OBRIEN,RAYMOND C GIBBONS,CHRISTINE SILVER,EDWARD FRENCH,RICHARD

CLUETT,WILLIAM VANZANDT,TATIANA PEARLMAN,JERRY BERIRO,ALBERT VANCE JR,JAMES

f law and fact that we review de novo. Adkins I. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1327 (11th Cir.2007). But we re

1949); a certification provided by statute, 28 U.S.C. 1292(b); a petition for a writ of mandamus; or an appeal of a contempt cita- tion. [8][91 The Perlman doctrine allows an intervenor to file an interlocutory ap- peal of an order denying a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena. See, e.g., In re Grand

Particular Decisions, Matters, or Questions as Review- able 17OBk33O5 k. Preliminary proceedings; depositions and discov- ery. Most Cited Cases The Perlman doctrine allows an intervenor to file an interlocutory appeal of an order denying a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena. (9) Federal Courts 17O8

dence 501 is a mixed question of 7 EFTA00209391 Case: 13-12923 Date Wit H4118/2014 Page: 8 of 23 law and fact that we review de novo. Adkins'. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1327 (11th Cir. 2007). But we review for clear error factual findings made by a district court. Morrissette-Brown'. Mobile Infirmar

his Interlocutory Appeal. The victims argue that we should dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction for two reasons. First, they argue that the Perlman doctrine, which permits a claimant of a privilege to appeal a non-final judgment, applies only to grand jury subpoenas. Perlman' United States, 247

dence 501 is a mixed question of 7 EFTA00209432 Case: 13-12923 Date Wit H4118/2014 Page: 8 of 23 law and fact that we review de novo. Adkins'. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1327 (11th Cir. 2007). But we review for clear error factual findings made by a district court. Morrissette-Brown'. Mobile Infirmar

his Interlocutory Appeal. The victims argue that we should dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction for two reasons. First, they argue that the Perlman doctrine, which permits a claimant of a privilege to appeal a non-final judgment, applies only to grand jury subpoenas. Perlman' United States, 247

3 law and fact that we review de novo. Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1327 (11th Cir. 2007). But we re

his Interlocutory Appeal. The victims argue that we should dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction for two reasons. First, they argue that the Perlman doctrine, which permits a claimant of a privilege to appeal a non-final judgment, applies only to grand jury subpoenas. Perlman v. United States, 2

0), we disfavor newly minted privileges, which "contravene the fundamental principle that the public has a right to every man's evidence," Adkins'. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007) (quoting Univ. of Pa.'. EEOC, 493 U.S. 182, 189, 110 S. Ct. 577, 582 (1990)). "Accordingly, there is a presum

his Interlocutory Appeal. The victims argue that we should dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction for two reasons. First, they argue that the Perlman doctrine, which permits a claimant of a privilege to appeal a non-final judgment, applies only to grand jury subpoenas. Perlman' United States, 247

velopment of [evidentiary] privileges." Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007), quoting T

f these issues for the functioning of the criminal justice system counsels in favor of granting the requested stay. Intervenors have standing under Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7 (1918), to pursue an interlocutory appeal of the Court's order, and questions of privilege and confidentiality asserte

velopment of [evidentiary] privileges!" Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007), quoting T

f these issues for the functioning of the criminal justice system counsels in favor of granting the requested stay. Intervenors have standing under Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7 (1918), to pursue an interlocutory appeal of the Court's order, and questions of privilege and confidentiality asserte

red by Robert A. Eckert, Jim Fogarty, Curt Forsythe,James M. Nederlander,James L. Neederlander,Eileen Newman,Arthur Newman, Catherine Oppenheimer,Lee Perlman,Ruthe Ponturo,Tony Ponturo,Marva Smalls,Reuven Spiegel. Tickets from $500.00. Tables from $10,000.00. New York Marriott Marquis. New York. (914) 579-

es. 6:30pm. Lecture and Q&A. Tickets from $10.00. Christie's Rockefeller Center. New York. [email protected]

od Industry Hospitality Industry Restaurant Association. American Federation of Arts ArtTalks Series. 6:30pm. Lecture and Q&A. Tickets from $10.00. Christie's Rockefeller Center. New York. [email protected]. (212) 988-7700. Event address: 20 Rockefeller Plaza, New York. Event web address: www.afaweb.org.