Epstein Secrets

ating a hostile work environment claim. See, e.g. Douglas Garmager, Comment, "Discrimination Outside of th

nd academic writing, Garcetti would directly conflict with the important First Amendment values previously articulated by the Supreme Court."). The Pickering test has two parts. First, the employee must show that his or her speech addressed "matters of public concern." Id. at 412 (quoting Pickering, 391

0207-3-49811 81 0 Dori 1 917 476 7742 Down 0207-235 5957 gz4 Doss, David & Christy Prunler 3New Y 15 Riversid Drive ork, NY 10024 Dr 001 Douglas, Diandra 123 East 69th Street 1 001 01 9 yahoo corn (Hmg36 Hot Sprin Road San Barvara. CA 3106 917 251 4959 other oeIl Zack Bacon (P) ra)

35 np I a 'I k elfg(tk61 33 1 4284 1010 (tu 331 67 03 69 69(w) Picciotto Michael 0207-584^ 00947 H _ 141378117Aw) 0 488461 00 41 22 9193203 Pickering, Jane & Wil- am 2 BBV 207-t99 9080(w) 0208-7499970(h) Pignatelli, Frederico 488 we ay~ NY NY 10 ppp pp pt 001 881 Plgozzi Jean 1 We 67

te criminal prosecutions, the rule is stated in Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 819 U.S. 167, 163-164, 63

olt—Nielsen's competitors, presumably for the purpose of apportioning customers among the companies and restraining com- petition. In January 2003, Pickering's successor, appellee Richard Wingfield, provided Nannes with four such lists, which confirmed that Stott-Nielsen had in- deed engaged in illegal