Epstein Secrets

hitesides, G. M., J. ✓ac. Sci. Technol. B, 1998, 16, 88-97. "Phase separation of ultrathin polymer-blend films on patterned substrates", Karim, A., Douglas, 3. F., Lee, B. P., Glotzer, S. C., Rogers, 3. A., Jackman, R. 3., Amis, E. J. and Whitesides, G. M., Phys. Rev. E., 1998, 57, R6273-R6276. 587.

ometal. Chem., 1977, 139, 151-163. 89. -The Location and Mobility of Functional Groups at the Surface of Oxidized, Low-Density Polyethylene Film", Rasmussen, J. R., Bergbreiter, D. E. and Whitesides, G. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99, 4746-4756. 88. "Introduction, Modification, and Characterization of

ble movements. Following a metaphor suggested by Douglas Hofstadter MOSES learning covers both "knob twid

of figuring out what schema to execute to achieve the chosen goal in the current context is done in Psi using a combination of processes called the "Rasmussen ladder" (named EFTA00623869 94 4 Brief Survey of Cognitive Architectures after Danish psychologist Jens Rasmussen). The Rasmussen ladder describ

ible movements. Following a metaphor suggested by Douglas Hofstadter [Hof96], MOSES learning covers both “k

of figuring out what schema to execute to achieve the chosen goal in the current context is done in Psi using a combination of processes called the “Rasmussen ladder” (named HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013009 94 4 Brief Survey of Cognitive Architectures after Danish psychologist Jens Rasmussen). The Rasmussen ladder

8, 1994. William H. Ogle, Ormond Beach, FL. W. Douglas Childs, Jacksonville, FL. Jonathan D. Kaney Jr.,

expectation of pri- vacy. He pointed out, "we have recognized that title potential for invasion of privacy is inherent in the litigation process.' Rasmussen, South Flor- ida Blood Service, 500 So.2d 533, 535 (Fla.1987). While civil litigants may have a legitimate expecta- tion of privacy in pretrial depo

8, 1994. William H. Ogle, Ormond Beach, FL. W. Douglas Childs, Jacksonville, FL. Jonathan D. Kaney Jr.,

ectation of pri- vacy. He pointed out, "we have ... recognized that It]he potential for invasion of privacy is inherent in the litigation process.' Rasmussen I South Flor- ida Blood Service, 500 So.2d 533, 535 (Fla.1987). While civil litigants may have a legitimate expecta- tion of privacy in pretrial