Epstein Secrets

on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou

ides no guarantee that compelled testimony will not somehow find its way into the government's hands for use in a subsequent criminal prosecution." Andover Data Servs. v. Stat. Tabulating Corp., 876 F.2d 1080, 1083 (2d Cir. 1989). As the Second Circuit has explained, a civil protective order may (as here) be overt

on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou

ides no guarantee that compelled testimony will not somehow find its way into the government's hands for use in a subsequent criminal prosecution." Andover Data Servs. v. Stat. Tabulating Corp., 876 F.2d 1080, 1083 (2d Cir. 1989). As the Second Circuit has explained, a civil protective order may (as here) be overt

on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou

ides no guarantee that compelled testimony will not somehow find its way into the government's hands for use in a subsequent criminal prosecution." Andover Data Servs. v. Stat. Tabulating Corp., 876 F.2d 1080, 1083 (2d Cir. 1989). As the Second Circuit has explained, a civil protective order may (as here) be overt

on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou

ides no guarantee that compelled testimony will not somehow find its way into the government's hands for use in a subsequent criminal prosecution." Andover Data Servs. v. Stat. Tabulating Corp., 876 F.2d 1080, 1083 (2d Cir. 1989). As the Second Circuit has explained, a civil protective order may (as here) be overt

on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou

ides no guarantee that compelled testimony will not somehow find its way into the government's hands for use in a subsequent criminal prosecution." Andover Data Servs. v. Stat. Tabulating Corp., 876 F.2d 1080, 1083 (2d Cir. 1989). As the Second Circuit has explained, a civil protective order may (as here) be overt