Document Mentions (5 shared documents)

EFTA00040664

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou

l protective order in the public interest. See Brown, 929 F.3d at 47;= v. Maxwell, 827 F. App'x 144, 145 (2d Cir. 2020); Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 126 (2d Cir. 2006). Civil litigants have neither a reasonable basis nor legal entitlement to rely on a civil protective order against

EFTA00106039

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou

il protective order in the public interest. See Brown, 929 F.3d at 47; v. Marvell, 827 F. App'x 144, 145 (2d Cir. 2020); Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 126 (2d Cir. 2006). Civil litigants have neither a reasonable basis nor legal entitlement to rely on a civil protective order against

EFTA00066510

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou

il protective order in the public interest. See Brown, 929 F.3d at 47; v. Maxwell, 827 F. App'x 144, 145 (2d Cir. 2020); Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 126 (2d Cir. 2006). Civil litigants have neither a reasonable basis nor legal entitlement to rely on a civil protective order against