Epstein Secrets

M. Zwirn Asia/Pacific Special Opportunities Fund, M. (the "Asia Pacific Fund"). These funds are referred to collectively herein as the "Funds". The Zwirn Entities M. Zwirn Partners, LLC, the General Partner of the Domestic Fund, the TE Fund and the Asia Pacific Fund prior to the transition from Zwirn

Fund prior to the transition from Zwirn to Fortress ("DBZGP"). M. Zwirn & Co., M., the Investment Manager of the Funds prior to the transition from Zwirn to Fortress ("DBZCO"). The Fortress Entities Fortress Investment Group LLC, a registered investment advisor that is affiliated with the entities t

Funds investment by investment in order to create a binder of investments for each Fund, which binder was anticipated to be available for review in Fortress's office by any investor in approximately one month. The Investment Binder would detail type of investment, valuation, exit strategy, and would inc

were invalid and set forth the schedule of eligible withdrawal dates for FTC's investments. FTC did not respond to the letter by claiming that Mr. Zwirn had promised to honor FTC's demand for $80 million. 17 EFTA00613924 FTC subsequently submitted a request for complete withdrawal on February 13,

Zwinz & Co., L.P., DBZ GP, LLC, and Zwirn Holdings, LLC EFTA00613904 Table of Contents Preliminary Statement 1 Statement of Facts 2 A. Mr. Zwirn's Personal Background 2 B. DBZ Background 2 I. DBZ's Investment Strategy 3 2. Mr. Zwirn's Role at DBZ 3 3. Mr. Dubin's Involvement with D

EFTA00613932 This conclusion holds regardless of whether there were separate quarter-end withdrawal dates for FTC's separate investment tranches (Fortress's and Third-Party Respondents' interpretation)16 or whether there was a single quarter-end withdrawal date for all of FTC's separate investments (F

clear that Dan Zwirn didn't want FTC to withdraw for a variety of self-interested reasons. But a compromise was struck between Epstein, Dubin, and Zwirn. Again, Dubin does not dispute this. As I said, there is a disagreement about what happened with Mr. Dubin and Epstein on one side, and Dan Zwirn o

d the right to I6I8I68vI/011585 2 EFTA00587013 Time:stamp: 7/20/2011 8:05 AM EDT make a withdrawal, FTC's $80 million would still be valid. Mr. Zwirn can't change the plain meaning of the language used. Similarly, questions about Dan Zwirns' credibility and the extent of his disclosures to FTC,

Act governs the priority of distribution for a limited liability company that has been dissolved and is in the subsequent process of winding down. Fortress says that it is winding up the Fund, and in the vernacular, maybe that's true. But Section 18-801(a) of the LLC Act provides very technical definit