11
Shared Docs
11
Same-Page
33 / 11
Mentions
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 21:52:23 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif the clawback is not davids problem., it is yours. gunderson has
was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto ] Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want
: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 21:52:23
t 5:43 PM, Boris Nikolic < > wrote: Please see a comment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto ] Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is
From: Boris Nikolic To: "Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 21:43:26 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.g
on was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want
From: Boris Nikolic To: "Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected])" <je
6 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif Please see a comment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is a
From: Boris Nikolic To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: FW: Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 21:55:15 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif OK Just a quick questi
n was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto: Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want
From: Boris Nikolic To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject:
t 5:43 PM, Boris Nikolic < > wrote: Please see a comment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto: Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is
<mailto > wrote: FYI</=> Please let me know wha= do you think. B=/p> <=> From: Steve R. Ray [mailtc j Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:50 PM To: Boris Nikolic Cc: Bennett L. Yee Subject: RE: Hi Boris, Peter seemed to think =hat something less than 50% would be acceptable from David's stand=oint. I asked hi
do you think. B=/p> <=> From: Steve R. Ray [mailtc j Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:50 PM To: Boris Nikolic Cc: Bennett L. Yee Subject: RE: Hi Boris, Peter seemed to think =hat something less than 50% would be acceptable from David's stand=oint. I asked him to discuss 1/3 or some other percentag
ent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 1:34 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: ask if i can talk to peter ,
570 EFTA02683226 On Wed A r 8 2015 at 1:02 PM, Boris Nikolic <mailto > wrote: FYI</=> Please let me know wha= do you think. B=/p> <=> From: Steve R. Ray [mailtc j Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:50 PM To: Boris Nikolic Cc: Bennett L. Yee Subject: RE: Hi Boris, Peter seemed to think =hat something
ment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400
Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want
From: Boris Nikolic Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 9:43 PM To: Jeffrey
not the intended recipient, please immediately delete this email and any attachments. From: Boris Nikolic Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 11:06 AM To: Steve R. Ray Subject: RE: Hi Steve, I am planning to sign this and send it today to Peter. Please can you just take a quick look. Currently I am offering 50%
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 9:52 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: the clawback is not davids problem., it is yours.40 gunderson has not moved your closer for 6 months now. 4> , forget them and
What do you think?=u> Gunderson was always very=worry about clawback issue B From: Steve Ray Sent: Monday, To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, wrote: I realize from your persp=ctive that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't h=ve to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I ju
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 9:52 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: the clawback is not davids pr
ent. If you are not th= intended recipient, please immediately delete this email and any attachme=ts. From: Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 11:06 AM To: Steve R. Ray Subject: RE: Hi Steve,</=pan> I am planning to sign thi= and send it today to Peter. Please can you just take = quick look. Currently I am offer
dispute or default. I would rather have an expiration on it From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 2:52 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: the clawback is not davids problem., it is yours. gunderson has not moved your closer for 6 months now. , forget them and get it
about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray EFTA_R1_01630533 EFTA02502308 Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want
From: Boris Nikolic Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 9:55 PM To: jeffrey
2015 at 5:43 PM, Boris Nikolic rote: Please see a comment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray EFTA_R1_01630533 EFTA02502308 Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective tha
Subject: FW: FYI Please let me know what do you think. B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:50 PM To: Boris Nikolic Cc: Bennett L Yee Subject: RE: Hi Boris, Peter seemed to think that something less than 50% would be acceptable from David's standpoint. I asked him
u think. B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:50 PM To: Boris Nikolic Cc: Bennett L Yee Subject: RE: Hi Boris, Peter seemed to think that something less than 50% would be acceptable from David's standpoint. I asked him to discuss 1/3 or some other percentag
From: Boris Nikolic <Boris.Nikolic@bqc3.com> Sent: Wednesday, April
Wednesday, April 8, 2015 5:02 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]) Subject: FW: FYI Please let me know what do you think. B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:50 PM To: Boris Nikolic Cc: Bennett L Yee Subject: RE: Hi Boris, Peter seemed to think t
u= I will assume it is all OK and sign it and send it to Peter. <1=> B <1=> <1=> <1=> From: Steve Ray Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 10:03 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: 3 EFTA_R1_01630666 EFTA02502391 Hi Boris, <1=> David may find the propos=l acceptable as, per the draft agreement, you would eff
> B <1=> <1=> <1=> From: Steve Ray Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 10:03 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: 3 EFTA_R1_01630666 EFTA02502391 Hi Boris, <1=> David may find the propos=l acceptable as, per the draft agreement, you would effectively be guarant=eing any clawback obligation that David
ay Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 10:03 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: 3 EFTA_R1_01630666 EFTA02502391
d recipient. If you are not th= intended recipient, please immediately delete this email and any attachme=ts. From: Boris Ni=oli Sent: Monday, To: Steve R. Ray Subject: RE: Hi Steve, <1=> I am planning to sign thi= and send it today to Peter. <1=> Please can you just take = quick look. <1=> Currently
From: Steve R. Ray [mailto Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the 5400
From: Steve R. Ray [mailto Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the 5400k up front. I just want
to Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your per
From: Steve R. Ray [mailto Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is a
Entities connected to both Boris Nikolic and Steve R. Ray

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Robert Gates
PERSONBentley
ORGANIZATIONGunderson
PERSONVilleneuve Franklin & Hachigian
ORGANIZATIONBlue Talon
ORGANIZATIONBoris Bentley
PERSONRedwood City
LOCATIONDigisite
ORGANIZATIONadmi=
ORGANIZATION