Epstein Secrets

ed States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.) 4 United States v. Perez, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7500 (D. Conn. June 16, 2006) 3 STATUTES 5 U.S.C. § 552 2, 10 OTHER AUTHORITIES Ali Watkins & Michael Gold, Jeffrey Eps

tuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of publicity. Neb. Press Ass 'n, 427 U.S. at 563-64 (enumerating methods to mitigate the effect of pre- trial publicity including: "change of [a trial] venue," "postponement of the

ed States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.) 4 United States v. Perez, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7500 (D. Conn. June 16, 2006) 3 STATUTES 5 U.S.C. § 552 2, 10 OTHER AUTHORITIES Ali Watkins & Michael Gold, Jeffrey Eps

tuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of publicity. Neb. Press Ass 'n, 427 U.S. at 563-64 (enumerating methods to mitigate the effect of pre- trial publicity including: "change of [a trial] venue," "postponement of the

ed States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.) 4 United States v. Perez, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7500 (D. Conn. June 16, 2006) 3 STATUTES 5 U.S.C. § 552 2, 10 OTHER AUTHORITIES Ali Watkins & Michael Gold, Jeffrey Eps

tuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of publicity. Neb. Press Ass 'n, 427 U.S. at 563-64 (enumerating methods to mitigate the effect of pre- trial publicity including: "change of [a trial] venue," "postponement of the