Epstein Secrets

ed States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.) 4 United States v. Perez, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7500 (D. Conn. June 16, 2006) 3 STATUTES 5 U.S.C. § 552 2, 10 OTHER AUTHORITIES Ali Watkins & Michael Gold, Jeffrey Eps

el, 554 F.3d 274 (2d Cir. 2009) 5, 9 Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75 (D.D.C. 1998) 10 Dep't of Def. v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487 (1994) 7 E.B. v. New York City Board of Educ., 233 F.R.D. 289 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) 8 Gonzalez v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 2 G

munications protected by the privilege. See id.; Schiller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285, at *34 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007); E.B. v. New York City Board of Educ., 233 F.R.D. 289, 293 (E.D.N.Y. 2005). Contrary to the Government's proposed application of Exemption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does no

ed States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.) 4 United States v. Perez, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7500 (D. Conn. June 16, 2006) 3 STATUTES 5 U.S.C. § 552 2, 10 OTHER AUTHORITIES Ali Watkins & Michael Gold, Jeffrey Eps

el, 554 F.3d 274 (2d Cir. 2009) 5, 9 Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75 (D.D.C. 1998) 10 Dep't of Def. v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487 (1994) 7 E.B. v. New York City Board of Educ., 233 F.R.D. 289 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) 8 Gonzalez v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 2 G

munications protected by the privilege. See id.; Schiller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285, at *34 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007); E.B. v. New York City Board of Educ., 233 F.R.D. 289, 293 (E.D.N.Y. 2005). Contrary to the Government's proposed application of Exemption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does no

ed States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.) 4 United States v. Perez, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7500 (D. Conn. June 16, 2006) 3 STATUTES 5 U.S.C. § 552 2, 10 OTHER AUTHORITIES Ali Watkins & Michael Gold, Jeffrey Eps

el, 554 F.3d 274 (2d Cir. 2009) 5, 9 Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75 (D.D.C. 1998) 10 Dep't of Def. v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487 (1994) 7 E.B. v. New York City Board of Educ., 233 F.R.D. 289 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) 8 Gonzalez v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 2 G

munications protected by the privilege. See id.; Schiller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285, at *34 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007); E.B. v. New York City Board of Educ., 233 F.R.D. 289, 293 (E.D.N.Y. 2005). Contrary to the Government's proposed application of Exemption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does no