Epstein Secrets

marizan 15-CR-00S Sentencing Engelmayer TM 1305 7/25/19 2:30 PM USA v. Zeller 19-CR.252 Sentencing Oetken TM 706 7/25/19 3:00 PM USA v. Perez 19-a-297 PTC Engelmayer TM 1305 7/25/19 3:30 PM USA v. Martinez Oil-CR-48d9 Oral Areument Rakoff OPM 148 7 Z 19 4:00 PM PART ONE Abram

ect to change without notice. DPM • Daniel Patrick Moynihan courthouse, .500 Pearl Street TM = Thurgood Marshall courthouse. 40 Centre Street WP • White Plains courthouse, 300 (htarropas Street EFTA00102258

Innes v. Dalsheim, 864 F.2d 974 (2d Cir. 1988) 14 LaSalle Bank Nat'l Ass 'n v. Nomura Asset Capital Corp., 424 F.3d 195 (2d Cir. 2005) 21, 27 Perez v. United States, Nos. 14 Civ. 846, 04 Cr. 937-1, 2015 WL 3413596 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) 18 Port Consol., Inc. v. Intl Ins. Co. of Hannover, PLC, 826 F

Maxwell on the anniversary of Epstein's indictment and maximize the announcement's appeal to the media, the government indicted Ms. Maxwell using a White Plains grand jury, thereby violating Ms. Maxwell's right to a grand jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community. • Finally, the government has

Innes v. Dalsheim, 864 F.2d 974 (2d Cir. 1988) 14 LaSalle Bank Nat'l Ass 'n v. Nomura Asset Capital Corp., 424 F.3d 195 (2d Cir. 2005) 21, 27 Perez v. United States, Nos. 14 Civ. 846, 04 Cr. 937-1, 2015 WL 3413596 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) 18 Port Consol., Inc. v. Intl Ins. Co. of Hannover, PLC, 826 F

Maxwell on the anniversary of Epstein's indictment and maximize the announcement's appeal to the media, the government indicted Ms. Maxwell using I White Plains grand jury, thereby violating Ms. Maxwell's right to grand jury drawn from I fair cross-section of the community. • Finally, the government has cha

006) 165 United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727 (1980) 82, 110 United States v. Pena, 932 F. Supp. 2d 464 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 147 United States v. Perez, 940 F. Supp. 540 (S.D.N.Y.I996) 189 United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018) passim United

iness 193 2. The SDNY Jury Plan 194 B. Applicable Law 197 C. Discussion 197 1. The Defendant Was Properly Indicted by a Grand Jury Sitting in White Plains 198 2. The Defendant's Fair Cross-Section Claim Is Meritless 204 a. The Defendant Has Not Established that Blacks or Hispanics Are Unfairly Repr

253 United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727 (1980) 115, 161, 162 United States v. Pena, 932 F. Supp. 2d 464 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 221 United States v. Perez, 940 F. Supp. 540 (S.D.N.Y.I996) 281 United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018) passim United

ess 194 2. The SDNY Jury Plan 195 B. Applicable Law 197 C. Discussion 198 1. The Defendant Was Properly Indicted by a Grand Jury Sitting in White Plains 198 2. The Defendant's Fair Cross-Section Claim Is Meritless 205 a. The Defendant Has Not Established that Blacks or Hispanics Are Unfairly Repres