Epstein Secrets

ought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citi

f 100 nsor & Associates Itcpanitnc had lranuripturri Inc 1 2 3 INDEX WITNESS: Page 3 PAGE: DIRECT EXAMINATION 4 4 BY MR. TEIN: 5 6 7 NOEXHIBITS MARKED 8 9 CERTIFIED QUESTIONS 10 Page Line 53 22 11 55 1 59 2 12 111 14 112 2 13 14 15 16 17 78 19 20 21 22 23 24

ought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citi

of 100 nsor & Associates Hopnrtua blIll Trams ripon, Inc 1 2 WITNESS: INDEX Page 3 PAGE: 3 DIRECT EXAMINATION 4 4 BY MR. TEIN: 5 6 7 NOEXHIBITS MARKED 8 9 CERTIFIED QUESTIONS 10 Page Line 53 22 11 55 1 59 2 12 111 14 112 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

ought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co.'. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citin

9 of 100 nsor & Associates Repnrnnp and Transcri pan Inc 1 2 WITNESS: INDEX Page 3 PAGE: 3 DIRECT EXAMINATION 4 4 BY MR. TEIN: 5 6 7 NOEXHIBITS MARKED 8 - - - 9 CERTIFIED QUESTIONS 10 Page Line 53 22 11 55 1 59 2 12 111 14 112 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2

ought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citi

ge 29 of 100 sor & Associates Rep/irons and Traucripuna, 1 2 3 INDEX WITNESS: Page 3 PAGE: DIRECT EXAMINATION 4 4 BY MR. TEIN: 5 6 7 NOEXHIBITS MARKED - 23 24 25 Page - CERTIFIED QUESTIONS Line 53 22 55 1 59 2 111 14 112 2 Ph. - Fax. 1655 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 50