4
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed
acts, “they would have taken steps to object” to the plea agreement, and that they believed criminal prosecution to be “extremely important”). 4 See ANTONIN SCALIA & BRYAN A. GARNER, READING Law: THE INTERPRETATION OF LEGAL TEXTS 56 (2012). °° 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a) (2012) (enumerating eight rights), id. § 3771(c)
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014050 →quotation marks omitted). 4 See, e.g., Texas v. Cobb, 532 U.S. 162, 172-73 (2001). 1 Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 398 (1977) (quoting Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 2, 689 (1972)). 1© See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 2006). 7 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14 n
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014069 →Article: Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute
ivate benefits that criminal justice is now widely recognized to afford, and owe, to victims. 27 See Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654, 727-28 (1988) (Scalia, J., dissenting) ("Law enforcement is not automatic ... . What every prosecutor is practically required to do is to select the cases for prosecution
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016515 →ement effort. For a rare example, see Heath v. Alabama, 474 U.S. 82, 91-93 (1985). 35. See U.S. Const. amend. V (Double Jeopardy Clause); Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121, 136-39 (1959) (affirming power of state to prosecute defendant after a federal prosecution for the same bank robbery); United States v
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016540 →CRIMINAL LAW: CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS DURING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS? APPLYING THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT BEFORE CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE FILED
protected rights under the Act even before charges are filed. [*73] C. COURTS RECOGNIZE THAT CRIME VICTIMS HAVE CVRA RIGHTS BEFORE CHARGING 4 See Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 56 (2012). % 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a) (2012) (enumerating eight rights); id. § 3771(c)(
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017612 →uotation marks omitted). ™ See, e.g., Texas v. Cobb, 532 U.S. 162, 172-73 (2001). 75 Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 398 (1977) (quoting Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682, 689 (1972)). 76 See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 2006). ” OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017624 →iana seat is technically undecided, the state went strongly Republican in the Presidential election and Kennedy is heavily favored to hold the seat. Illinois Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL) lost his race to Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL). In Indiana, Rep. Todd Young (R-IN) won his race against former Democratic Sena
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022374 →gh legal action or public pressure. Trump also intends to immediately begin the process of filling the Supreme Court vacancy created by the death of Antonin Scalia in early 2016 —one that could spark fireworkson Capitol Hilland acrossthe country’s highly charged political environment. How Republicans, Democrats,
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022380 →Entities connected to both Illinois and Antonin Scalia

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Donald Trump
PERSON
Barack Obama
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Michigan
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON