Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
udication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements . . . .'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
evidence and satisfy itself as to the existence of its power to hear the case" without presuming the truthfulness of the plaintiff's allegations. Makro Capital of America, Inc. v. UBS AG, 543 F.3d 1254, 1258 (11th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted); see also, e.g., McMaster v. United States, 177 F.3d 936, 940 (11th Cir. 1999) (
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements ....'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
evidence and satisfy itself as to the existence of its power to hear the case" without presuming the truthfulness of the plaintiff's allegations. Makro Capital of America, Inc. v. UBS AG, 543 F.3d 1254, 1258 (11th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted); see also, e.g., McMaster v. United States, 177 F.3d 936, 940 (11th Cir. 1999) (
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements ....'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
evidence and satisfy itself as to the existence of its power to hear the case" without presuming the truthfulness of the plaintiff's allegations. Makro Capital of America, Inc. v. UBS AG, 543 F.3d 1254, 1258 (11th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted); see also, e.g., McMaster v. United States, 177 F.3d 936, 940 (11th Cir. 1999) (
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements ....'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
evidence and satisfy itself as to the existence of its power to hear the case" without presuming the truthfulness of the plaintiff's allegations. Makro Capital of America, Inc. v. UBS AG, 543 F.3d 1254, 1258 (11th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted); see also, e.g., McMaster v. United States, 177 F.3d 936, 940 (11th Cir. 1999) (
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
udication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements . . . .'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
evidence and satisfy itself as to the existence of its power to hear the case" without presuming the truthfulness of the plaintiff's allegations. Makro Capital of America, Inc. v. UBS AG, 543 F.3d 1254, 1258 (11th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted); see also, e.g., McMaster v. United States, 177 F.3d 936, 940 (11th Cir. 1999) (
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
udication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements . . . .'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
evidence and satisfy itself as to the existence of its power to hear the case" without presuming the truthfulness of the plaintiff's allegations. Makro Capital of America, Inc. v. UBS AG, 543 F.3d 1254, 1258 (11th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted); see also, e.g., McMaster v. United States, 177 F.3d 936, 940 (11th Cir. 1999) (
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00010476
evidence and satisfy itself as to the existence of its power to hear the case" without presuming the truthfulness of the plaintiff's allegations. Makro Capital of America, Inc. v. UBS AG, 543 F.3d 1254, 1258 (11th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted); see also, e.g., McMaster v. United States, 177 F.3d 936, 940 (11th Cir. 1999) (
Page: EFTA00010476 →Page EFTA00010480
udication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements . . . .'") (quoting Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F.3d 1301, 1315 (11th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotations omitted))). Under the ripeness doctrine, a court must therefore determine "'whether
Page: EFTA00010480 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (166)
Entities connected to both Atlanta and Makro Capital of America, Inc.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON860 w/ Atlanta·9 w/ Makro
United States
LOCATION249 w/ Atlanta·9 w/ Makro
LB
Leon Black
PERSON218 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Makro
Phoenix
LOCATION213 w/ Atlanta·6 w/ Makro
Marc Rich
PERSON185 w/ Atlanta·4 w/ Makro
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION175 w/ Atlanta·4 w/ Makro
Julie K. Brown
PERSON164 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Makro
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON133 w/ Atlanta·7 w/ Makro
New York
LOCATION131 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Makro
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON122 w/ Atlanta·8 w/ Makro
FBI
ORGANIZATION115 w/ Atlanta·7 w/ Makro
George Mitchell
PERSON120 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Makro
Colorado
LOCATION119 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Makro
Samantha Power
PERSON112 w/ Atlanta·8 w/ Makro
Michael Cohen
PERSON112 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Makro
James Baker
PERSON104 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Makro
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON100 w/ Atlanta·4 w/ Makro
Woody Allen
PERSON101 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Makro
Bradley Edwards
PERSON83 w/ Atlanta·7 w/ Makro
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON88 w/ Atlanta·2 w/ Makro