Epstein Secrets

ification form did not disclose travel to any other countries. It was later discovered by law enforcement authorities that Epstein also travelled to Vienna and Monaco during that trip. 80. Similarly, the Epstein Enterprise sought to prevent DPNR from conducting routine site visits to inspect unpermit

ng as president, member, manager, or director of each of the entities and, upon information and belief, directing their activities. 19. Defendant, Nautilus, Inc., is a corporation established and organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands. It was incorporated on November 22, 2011. 20. According to recor

ification form did not disclose travel to any other countries. It was later discovered by law enforcement authorities that Epstein also travelled to Vienna and Monaco during that trip. 80. Similarly, the Epstein Enterprise sought to prevent DPNR from conducting routine site visits to inspect unpermit

ng as president, member, manager, or director of each of the entities and, upon information and belief, directing their activities. 19. Defendant, Nautilus, Inc., is a corporation established and organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands. It was incorporated on November 22, 2011. 20. According to recor

ification form did not disclose travel to any other countries. It was later discovered by law enforcement authorities that Epstein also travelled to Vienna and Monaco during that trip. 80. Similarly, the Epstein Enterprise sought to prevent DPNR from conducting routine site visits to inspect unpermit

ng as president, member, manager, or director of each of the entities and, upon information and belief, directing their activities. 19. Defendant, Nautilus, Inc., is a corporation established and organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands. It was incorporated on November 22, 2011. 20. According to recor

ification form did not disclose travel to any other countries. It was later discovered by law enforcement authorities that Epstein also travelled to Vienna and Monaco during that trip. 80. Similarly, the Epstein Enterprise sought to prevent DPNR from conducting routine site visits to inspect unperrni

most all of Epstein's assets. See Compl. 72 l3. Furthermore, the Executors are also officers of at least two of Epstein's entities, Poplar, Inc. and Nautilus, Inc., alleged to be intricately involved in carrying out Epstein's illegal enterprise. Id. at 19-22; 28-30. The Executors appear to be close allies of

s notification form did not disclose travel to any other countries. It was later found by law enforcement authorities that Epstein also travelled to Vienna and Monaco during that trip. 135. Similarly, the Epstein Enterprise sought to prevent DPNR from conducting routine site visits to inspect unpermi

ng as president, member, manager, or director of each of the entities and, upon information and belief, directing their activities. 22. Defendant, Nautilus, Inc., is a corporation established and organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands. It was incorporated on November 22, 2011. 23. According to recor

s notification form did not disclose travel to any other countries. It was later found by law enforcement authorities that Epstein also travelled to Vienna and Monaco during that trip. 135. Similarly, the Epstein Enterprise sought to prevent DPNR from conducting routine site visits to inspect unpermi

ng as president, member, manager, or director of each of the entities and, upon information and belief, directing their activities. 22. Defendant, Nautilus, Inc., is a corporation established and organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands. It was incorporated on November 22, 2011. 23. According to recor

ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and ADMINISTRATOR OF THE 1953 TRUST; ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, THE 1953 TRUST, PLAN D, LLC; GREAT ST. JIM, LLC; NAUTILUS, INC.; HYPERION AIR, LLC; POPLAR, INC., SOUTHERN TRUST COMPANY, INC.; JOHN AND JANE DOES DEFENDANTS, Case No.: ACTION FOR DAMAGES JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

te of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 17 of 55 It was later found by law enforcement authorities that Epstein also travelled to Vienna and Monaco during that trip. 83. Similarly, the Epstein Enterprise sought to prevent DPNR from conducting routine site visits to inspect unpermit