Document Mentions (4 shared documents)

EFTA00317171

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

countries had lower rates. In the UK, the rate was a full 16 percentage point lower than in the United States (23%). In all OECD countries except Chile, the tax rates have declined since 2000, and quite substantially in some countries. The United States Figure 2 Effective corporate tax rates in s

ealand 9.4 15.4 18.7 17.7 14.3 14.6 11.9 Norway 11.7 12.4 9.6 10.7 10.3 9.5 10.1 Poland 4.4 5.2 4.5 Portugal 4.3 5.5 5.5 5.6 Slovak Republic 3.4 2.6 2.3 Slovenia 5.6 5.5 5.7 Spain 2.1 2.7 5.4 7.1 6.4 7.5 7.0 Sweden 16.2 19.0 18.4 20.1 17.1 14.6 12.7 Switzerland 5.8

EFTA01365038

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

rs after the call ends): International: US: Reservation number: Participant FreeCall Dial in numbers: United Kingdom Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Chile China Colombia Denmark Estonia Finland Hon: Kong Hungary Ireland Israel Latvia Luxembourg Netherlands New Zealand Portu al Greece Ind

rg Netherlands New Zealand Portu al Greece Indonesia Korea South Philippines Singapore Sweden Turkey Belgium, Brussels Argentina Poland Slovak Republic Switzerland United States China Denmark, Copenhagen Paris Germany, Frankfurt Dublin Ireland, Dublin Italy, Milan Vilnius Netherlands, Amst

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021434_sub_001 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021533

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

itory * British Virgin Islands * Bulgaria Bulgaria Burma Canada Canada Canada Extradition Protocol Canada Extradition Protocol Cayman Islands * Chile Colombia + Congo Congo - Congo Congo" Costa Rica Croatia - Cuba Cuba Cuba * “*k ak ' Cyprus Czech Republic Czech Republic Denmark Dominica

Guinea Paraguay Peru Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Romania “SarrMarino San Marino Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Singapore Slovak Republic Slovak Republic Slovenia *™* Solomon Islands South. Africa South Africa South Korea Spain 3 Supplementary Spain 2"? Supplementary Spain Supplement