Epstein Secrets

versity of New York at Buffalo Associate Professor and Director, Dual Degree Program in Psychology and Law Department of Psychology University of Denver Assistant Professor and Director, Dual Degree Program in Psychology and the Law Department of Psychology University of Denver Lecturer Departme

ue is key. Brown University Newsletter. Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Evaluation of children's testimony: Factors influencing the jury. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702-731 Goodman, G. S. (1994). Review of The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony. Child Developm

of Washington The Royal Society, London American Psychological Assn, Anaheim Max Planck Institute, West Berlin American Society of Criminology, Denver Merrill Lynch, Palm Springs 1984 University of British Columbia University of Toronto 36 EFTA00073105 Williams College (IBM Lectureship) Roa

minal, 1988 Supplement. Kluwer Law Books, 1-37. Bell, B. & Loftus, E.F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1171-1192. Schooler, J.W., Foster, R.A., & Loftus, E.F. (1988). Some deleterious consequences of the act of recollection. Memory and Cognition

S. (1984). The accuracies and inaccuracies of children's eyewitness reports. In D. Bross (Ed.), Multidisciplinary advocacy for mistreated children. Denver, CO: National Association of Counsel of Children. Goodman, G. S. (Ed.). (1984). The child witness. Journal of Social Issues, 40(2). Goodman, G. S.

ue is key. Brown University Newsletter. Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Evaluation of children's testimony: Factors influencing the jury. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702-732. Goodman, G. S. (1994). Review of The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony. Child Develop