4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
ights are determined under state law, even when the United States is a party." United States v. O'Block, 788 F.2d 1433, 1435 (10th Cir.1986) (citing Oregon ex rel. State Land Bd. v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co., 429 U.S. 363, 378-81, 97 S.Ct. 582, 50 L.Ed.2d 550 (1977)). [FN7] FN7. Indeed, the Supreme C
FN6. Other courts, too, have applied state substantive law as the rule of decision in landlord-tenant disputes involving the Government. See, e.g., Braxton v. United States, 858 F.2d 650, 655 (11th Cir.1988) (holding that Florida law applies to determine whether one who occupies land forfeited by the Go
s land for- termined under state law, even when the United States is a party." United States 1 O'Block, 788 F.2d 1423, 1435 (10th Cir.198M (citing Oregon ex rel. State Land lid Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co., 429 U.S. 363, 378-81, 97 S.Ct. 582, 60 L.Ed.2d 650 (1977)).7 Second, application of state subst
6. Other courts, too, have applied state substan- tive law as the rule of decision In landlord-tenant disputes involving the Government. See, e.g., Braxton'. United States, 858 F.2d 650. 655 (11th Cir.19881 (holding that Florida law applies to determine whether one who occupies land for- termined under
ghts are determined under state law, even when the United States is a party." United States v. O'Block, 788 F.2d 1433, 1435 (10th Cir.1986) (citing Oregon ex rel. State Land Bd. v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co., 429 U.S. 363, 378-81, 97 S.Ct. 582, 50 L.Ed.2d 550 (1977)). [FN7] FN7. Indeed, the Supreme C
FN6. Other courts, too, have applied state substantive law as the rule of decision in landlord-tenant disputes involving the Government. See, e.g., Braxton v. United States, 858 F.2d 650, 655 (11th Cir.1988) (holding that Florida law applies to SDNY_GM_02742801 EFTA_00229450 EFTA01325016 determine
2014 Yes David Watson Massachusetts No 25,000 1 April 22, 2014 Yes Robert Slattery Connecticut No 20,000 1 April 29, 2014 Yes Kyle Oregon No 10,000 1 May 1, 2014 Yes GDSVFM111685497.2 5 EFTA00293488 CONFIDENTIAL Marshall Joshua Staker Oregon No 10,000 I May 1, 2014 Ti
Yes William Christopher Jordan New York No 20,000 1, 3 January 1, 2014 Yes Clarence Tso New York No 20,000 1,3 January 1, 2014 Yes Braxton Robbason New York No 20,000 1,3 January 1, 2014 Yes Robert Abel New York No 100,000 I, 4 January 1, 2014 Yes Michael Beachy New York
Entities connected to both Oregon and Braxton

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATION
Michael Cohen
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Lawrence Krauss
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Anderson
PERSON
Bill Burns
PERSONFisher
PERSON
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION
New York State
LOCATIONthe Postal Service
ORGANIZATION
Ecuador
LOCATIONU.S. Govt
ORGANIZATIONthe Federal Circuit
ORGANIZATIONMassey
LOCATIONThe Second Circuit
ORGANIZATIONForman
PERSONJeffrey Schantz
PERSON