Epstein Secrets

PPP Fraud Charges. • Sentencing Of Former Atlantic City, New Jersey Mayor Delayed For Sixth Time. • Another Charged In College Admissions Probe. • Oregon Couple Who Scammed Elderly Victims Sentenced To Federal Prison. • US Charges Two In $12M Scheme Targeting Investors In Puerto Rico. • Trial Of Chic

s-surveillance-program-exposed-by- snowden-was-illegal-idUSKRN25T3CK> (9/2, Satter) reports that a ruling Wednesday from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit "said the warrantless telephone dragnet that secretly collected millions of Americans' telephone records violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveilla

ransferred To Federal Lockup In Brooklyn. PROTESTS • New Mexico Militia Was Involved In June Shooting Incident In Albuquerque. • Door Of Portland, Oregon Federal Courthouse Shattered, Fireworks Exploded Inside. • Phoenix Police Kill Man In Parked Car, Sparking Protests. • Trump Says Sports Franchises

s Administration's Asylum Ban Is Unlawful. The New York Times (7/6, Jordan, 18.61M) reports that a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Monday "struck down President Trump's policy that barred most migrants from seeking asylum in the United States if they had passed through anothe

imate by state is shown in the following chart. 2017 U.S. State-Legal Cannabis Market Estimate Other States $1.9B California $3.2B Colorado $1.5B Oregon Washington $470M $929M Source: Ackrell Capital U.S. Federal Law Current federal law effectively prohibits all cannabis use and all commercial cannab

ts of THC and THC occurring naturally in the cannabis plant. In its 2004 holding in Hemp Industries Association v. DEA, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit enjoined DEA enforcement of this purported amendment and held that the THC listed separately from marijuana on Schedule I includes only synthetic THC

tims can attend any public deposition taken under this rule under the same conditions as govern a victim's attendance at trial. 7}5 212° Wardius v. Oregon, 412 U.S. 470, 475 (1973). iS) 3 Cassell, Proposed Amendments, supra note 4, at 873. iS) 4 Apparently in response to my argument, the Advisory Co

ght of the conference report on Rule 16, compelling disclosure of witness names before trial appears inconsistent with the federal rules. And even if the Ninth Circuit's approach was valid at the time Armstrong was decided, such an approach is no longer valid in light of the CVRA. Rule 57(b) only provides a basis for