Epstein Secrets

mporary restraining order Thursday night "against federal agents from arresting or using force against legal observers and journalists in Portland, Oregon." District Judge Michael Simon granted the restraining order "in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon." Axios

tween Pompeo and...Rudy Giuliani — which ultimately led to the ouster of U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch --" were "deeply disturbing." Kenna testified that "she was unaware of the substance of Giuliani's outreach at the time, but now knows it was an effort to discredit Yovanovitch." Kenna

mporary restraining order Thursday night "against federal agents from arresting or using force against legal observers and journalists in Portland, Oregon." District Judge Michael Simon granted the restraining order "in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon." Axio

tween Pompeo and...Rudy Giuliani - which ultimately led to the ouster of U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch --" were "deeply disturbing." Kenna testified that "she was unaware of the substance of Giuliani's outreach at the EFTA00149908 time, but now knows it was an effort to discredit Yova

mporary restraining order Thursday night "against federal agents from arresting or using force against legal observers and journalists in Portland, Oregon." District Judge Michael Simon granted the restraining order "in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon." Axio

tween Pompeo and...Rudy Giuliani - which ultimately led to the ouster of U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch --" were "deeply disturbing." Kenna testified that "she was unaware of the substance of Giuliani's outreach at the time, but now knows it was an effort to discredit Yovanovitch." Kenna

language in [the CVRA] was agreed to."). °! 150 Cong. Rec. H8208-09 (daily ed. Oct. 6, 2004). °2 150 Cong. Rec. $10910 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004). % Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1015-16 (9th Cir. 2006) (internal quotations and citations omitted); accord United St

tims can attend any public deposition taken under this rule under the same conditions as govern a victim's attendance at trial. 7}5 212° Wardius v. Oregon, 412 U.S. 470, 475 (1973). iS) 3 Cassell, Proposed Amendments, supra note 4, at 873. iS) 4 Apparently in response to my argument, the Advisory Co

to situations where victims seek "relevant" contents of the presentence report to make a victim impact statement at sentencing. Second, the victim in Kenna sought the entire presentence report. The Ninth Circuit pointedly observed: "We note that Kenna refused the district court's offer to consider disclo