Epstein Secrets

2d SERIES mainly banks in Arab and Islamic coun- tries. Ashton Complaint 11583; Burnett Complaint 147. It also has banks in Chi- cago, Illinois and Houston, Texas. Bur- nett Complaint II 47. Al Baraka allegedly provided financial infrastructures in Sudan to Osama bin Laden through Defendant charity Al

harged with decid- ing which grants should be made to Islam- ic charities, Prince Sultan's decisions were made at the planning level of government, Kline, 685 F.Supp. at 392, and "grounded in social, economic, and political policy," Varig Airlines, 467 U.S. at 814, 104 S.CL 2755. Similarly, as the

eting FICA)). Generally, acts are discretionary if they are per- formed at the planning level of govern- ment, as opposed to the operational level. Kline v. Kaneko, 685 F.Supp. 386, 392 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (finding decision to expel plaintiff from Mexico was product of en- forcement of immigration laws an

rm #8471769 Tail#N855PT 7:30pm Depart Bedford, Signature Aviation 8:22pm Arrive NZ Teterboro, Meridian Fri. March 18 2016 NY Reminder. lofty to Houston via 10:00am SKYPE Call w/Arthur Casas 11:45am apps wMa I:15pm Appt Iv/Rich Kahn 4:00pm Appt Iv/Leon Black a) at 9:39am Rec. Sat March 19. 2016

om Pinto's office in NY March 31-April 2 9:00am Appt Iv/Dr. Magnani 7 W. 51" Street, 7th Floor, between 5th & 6th TO DRIVE YOU 10:00am Appt w/Dr. Kline 700 Park Ave (between 69th and 70th) EFTA00315402 12:30pm Haircut )v/Patrick at Fekkai Salon TO DRIVE YOU 1:30pm Appt )v/Rich Kahn 7:30pm Dinn

axi 10022 EFTA00191552 ,edife430•Slcowe Hatsuhana (Japanese) 01710Emilis Helsiace 0101 II Cantinori 32 East 10 (et Broadway) II Tre Marli Houston SUeet West B 691 709rvaY Karen Pets 1195 Le ton Ave. d Sts. Klinger, Georgette 480 Madison Ave. 10021 Florida Series r201482 Norme Jean L

głą Jenie (mom) 5 6 36860 Karen Mesa id 467 0412 Kapa (h) gypsys aPrd 744017 3565 Kristen IM 54 2 3309 Kiery (Usa Pe Mend) 1 329021 K 1 7 Kline 561 346 2 Lina p 61 615 9 ina rtl° 4 CO) 561 352 70 Lina P 561 7 561 6i7 Maura ) 561 f 5 i 880 Mealiisrasa allis kei 74g il4nes (h) dl

ck Up SUV Confirm Tait 7:30pm Depart Bedford, Signature Aviation 8:22pm Arrive NY, Teterboro, Meridian Fri. March 18 2016 NY Reminder to fly to Houston via United#1973 at 9:39am Rec. Loco (Carsco#1.51735) 10:00am SKYPE Call w/Arthur Casas (skype ID: 11:45am apps w 1:15pm Appt w/Rich Kahn 4:00pm

Wed. March 30. 2016 NY Reminder: Jean from Pinto's office in NY March 31-April 2 9:00am Appt w/Dr. Magnani JOJO TO DRIVE YOU 10:00am A t w Dr. Kline 12:30pm Haircut w/Patrick at Fekkai Salon JOJO TO DRIVE YOU 1:30pm Appt w/Rich Kahn 7:30pm Dinner w oody Allen & Soon Yi to organize food) (So

utory foreign sovereign immunity and protecting a sovereign’s or sovereign’s agency’s legitimate claim to immunity from discovery.” First City, Texas—Houston, N.A. v. Rafidain Bank, 150 F.3d 172, 176 (2d Cir.1998) (ordering full discovery against defendant over whom court al- ready had subject matter juris

preting FTCA)). Generally, acts are discretionary if they are per- formed at the planning level of govern- ment, as opposed to the operational level. Kline v. Kaneko, 685 F.Supp. 386, 392 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (finding decision to expel plaintiff from Mexico was product of en- forcement of immigration laws and

charged with decid- ing which grants should be made to Islam- ic charities, Prince Sultan’s decisions were made at the planning level of government, Kline, 685 F.Supp. at 392, and “grounded in social, economic, and political policy,” Varig Airlines, 467 U.S. at 814, 104 S.Ct. 2755. Similarly, as the hea

unction exception replicates that found in the FTCA and that courts rely on the FTCA for guidance in interpreting the scope of the FSIA’s exception); Kline v. Kaneko, 685 F.Supp. 386, 392 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (explaining sovereign’s decisions regarding formation and enforcement of national policies are discret

garding NCB’s FSIA defense would necessarily subject the Kingdom to discovery, which the Court is hesitant to do unnecessarily. See First City, Texas—Houston, N.A. v. Rafidain Bank, 150 F.3d 172, 176 (2d Cir.1998); see also Arriba Ltd. v. Petroleos Mexicanos, 962 F.2d 528, 534 (Sth Cir.1992) (recommending