Epstein Secrets

After Bomb Threat In Lavatory Fox News (05/21, Koch) reported that a United Airlines flight (Flight 1169) from Honolulu to Los Angeles returned to Hawaii due to a "potential security concern" found written on a bathroom mirror. The Boeing 777 plane, carrying 339 passengers and 10 crew members, landed

ccording to the article, lead agents Jon Hersley and Larry Tongate, who led the investigation, discussed the key pieces of evidence that pointed to McVeigh and Terry Nichols, including a card and earplugs found in McVeigh's possession. The article noted that the investigation, which was the largest in F

eat In Lavatory EFTA01655967 Fox News (05/21, Koch) reported that a United Airlines flight (Flight 1169) from Honolulu to Los Angeles returned to Hawaii due to a "potential security concern" found written on a bathroom mirror. The Boeing 777 plane, carrying 339 passengers and 10 crew members, landed

According to the article, lead agents Jon Henley and Larry Tongate, who led the investigation, discussed the key pieces of evidence that pointed to McVeigh and Terry Nichols, including a card and earplugs found in McVeigh's possession. The article noted that the investigation, which was the largest in F

itution Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-647, 104 Stat. 4820 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 10601, 10606-07 (2006)). 3 See, e.g., United States v. McVeigh, 106 F.3d 325, 328 (10th Cir. 1997) (per curiam) (refusing to enforce a victim’s right to attend a trial), Cassell, Barbarians at the Gates?, supra n

hts if counts are dismissed.**° Arizona courts have also permitted victims to invoke their rights in the context of civil forfeiture proceedings.”*! Hawaii’s victims’ rights statute illustrates how a state has defined the term “case” more expansively than the limited definition advocated by the Departmen

stitution Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-647, 104 Stat. 4820 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C.$$/0601, 10606-07 (2006)). 2 See, e.g., United States v. McVeigh, 106 F.3d 325, 328 (10th Cir. 1997) (per curiam) (refusing to enforce a victim's right to attend a trial); Cassell, Barbarians at the Gates?, supra n

s if counts are dismissed. 73° Arizona courts have also permitted victims to invoke their rights in the context of civil forfeiture proceedings. 73! Hawaii's victims’ rights statute illustrates how a state has defined the term "case" more expansively than the limited definition advocated by the Departmen