Epstein Secrets

y determination on that ground. But I don't have any reason to think that he should not remain in place.' Garland also would not commit to releasing Durham's full report. 'I am a great believer in transparency,' Garland said. 'I would, though, have to talk with Mr. Durham and understand the nature of w

on whether he would commit to allowing Durham to continue his probe through the Biden administration. `Will you commit to providing Special Counsel Durham with staff, resources and funds needed to thoroughly complete his investigation?' Grassley asked." Garland "said that, at this point, he does not h

Sees "No Reason" Why Durham Probe Should Not Be Left In Place. Fox News (2/22, Singman, 23.99M) reports that Garland "said he sees 'no reason' why" Durham "should not be left in place to continue his investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe - but he wouldn't explicitly make a committal

ylvania, refusing to take up a months-long dispute over extending the deadline in that state for receiving mail-in ballots." Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas "said it deserved the court's attention, even though the number of votes at issue would not call into question Biden's victory

" because "it is critical the American people understand how their government, their agencies, have turned on them." The article mentioned that the Durham report accused the FBI of treating Clinton's presidential campaign differently than Trump's campaign. Navajo Leaders Seek Tribal Members Caught Up

s Court Fight • Texas Militia Member Sentenced To Nearly Five Years In Prison For Attacking Police During Capitol Riot OTHER FBI NEWS • Graham on Durham's Trump-FBI Report: 'It Is Done and It's Damning' • Pro-Life Activist Elise Ketch Speaks on FBI Agents Visiting Mom's House • Congress May Use 'Pow

Abortion Ban, Restrictions On Gender-Affirming Care For Minors • COVID Emergency Orders Are Among 'Greatest Intrusions On Civil Liberties,' Justice Gorsuch Says • Georgia Prosecutor Signals August Timetable for Charges in Trump Inquiry • Small, Rural Communities Are Becoming Abortion Access Battlegroun

• Fox News: Justice Gorsuch Calls Out 'Intrusions' as Supreme Court Dismisses Title 42 Migrant Policy Suit • Business Insider: Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch Calls COVID-19 Response "The Greatest Intrusion on Civil Liberties in Peacetime History" Georgia Prosecutor Signals August Timetable for Charges in

ous running commentary on the investigation violates Justice Department rules, politicized the investigation and damaged the credibility of whatever Durham uncovers.' He concludes, "In short, Barr has acted in ways that foreseeably politicize and damage the investigation that he initiated and has devote

ngs or initiate prosecutions until after the 2020 presidential election." Two sources familiar with the investigation "told Fox News this week that Durham is working expeditiously to try to finish the probe by the end of summer, but that several lines of investigation are not yet complete." One source

USA Today (7/9, Wolf, 10.31M) says "the 7-2 decision...written by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Trump's two nominees, Associate Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh," sends "the separation of powers dispute back to lower courts for further determination." The Washington Post (7/9, Barnes, 14

.2M) says "the question for the court was whether Congress officially eliminated the Creek Nation reservation when Oklahoma became a state in 1907." Gorsuch wrote, "If Congress wishes to withdraw its promises, it must say so. Unlawful acts, performed long enough and with sufficient vigor, are never enoug