Epstein Secrets

man,' Simona Ghetti,' Jodi A. Quas,2 Robin S. Edelstein,' Kristen Weede Alexander,' Allison D. Redlich,' Ingrid M. Cordon,' and David P.H. Jones' 'University of California. Davis: 'University of California. Irvine; 'Stanford University; and 'University of Oxford. Par* Hospital for Children. Oxford. England Abstract—Pr

eriences of sexual abuse can become inaccessible to con- sciousness. Although core features of stressful events are often panicu- lwly well retained (Christianson. 1992), debate centers on whether, for highly traumatic events, special memory mechanisms supercede normal memory processes. Some researchers argue

actors like event salience and personal rele- vance may facilitate memory retention (e.g., Baker-Ward. Hess. & Flanagan, 1990: Bower & Sivers. 1998; Christianson, 1992). severe abuse, which typically includes invasive sexual contact, force, or both. would be more likely to be remembered than less severe abus

an2, Rakel P. Larson3, Mitchell L. Eisen', and Jianjian Qins oen:Lament of Psychology, Florida International university: 'Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis. 'Department of Psychology, Pities College. 'Department of Psychology, California State University, Las Angeles; and ^Derailment of Psycholo

der the relation of the event to one's life course (Berntsen & Rubin, 2006; Frankenhuis & Weenh, 2013); the emotional or taboo nature of the acts (Christianson, 1992; Goodman et al., 1990); meta-cognitive abilities (Koriat et al., 2000), especially in relation to schema-expected, plausible acts (Pezdek et

opardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of chiklren's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10180- 000 Christianson, S. A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309. Connolly, I). A., Chong, K., Cobur

tein,3 Allison D. ReAllich,3 Ingrid M. Cordon,3 and David P.H. Jones(' ! California State University; Sacramento; 2Univenity of California, Irvine; 'University of California, Davis; 4Research Institute on. Judicial Systems, National Research Council, Bologna, Italy; sPolicy Research Associates, Inc., Delmar, Nev York; a

aps because of their salience or distinctiveness. They may activate physiological (e.g., amygrIala; LeDoux, 2000) and behavioral (e.g., rehearsal; Christianson, 1992) responses that help con- solidate or maintain memories, possibly including memories for whole categories of experiences. Moreover, for highly

-Term Memory for Childhood Events: Impact Matters Gail S. Goodman,' Jodi A. Quas,2 Deborah Goltlfarb,3 Lauren Gonzalves,1 and Alejandra Gonzalez' 'University of California, Davis, 2University of California, Irvine, and 3 Florida International University ABSTRACT-In recent years, society has been stunned by high-profi

d the most important compo- nents of the stressful event, leading to enhanced memory for those components but weaker memory for peripheral details (Christianson, 1992). Forgetting and ermrs still occur. but they typically do so to a lesser extent than for memory of less nega- tive events, even in children (C